2023-05-03
A startling article from Technocracy News and Trends, obviously prompted by the up-coming coronation, features King Charles of the WEF.
"King Charles ... outlines the “10 actions we must take to drive the green recovery.” These 10 actions ... would allow for basically no freedom in a top-down dictatorship that decides for us how all resources are to be allocated and used"
" ... in order to allow ... assessments of sustainability compliance ... It is time now to move towards unified metrics and global standards, to encourage accelerated progress ... "
And there will be a meeting in September to discuss how to get their stalled project back on track.
Bird flu (or whatever) permitting no doubt.
But what I find difficult to decide is this - does the King work for the WEF (which would clearly be utterly unconstitutional in the United Kingdom), or does the WEF work for the King - which would morally be just as bad but possibly not actually legally (although possibly still lawfully) unconstitutional?
