Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

So Who Was the Organ-Grinder?

Details
Category: Covid
Hits: 1271

2023-03-19

More follow-on in the wake of the Hancock WhatsApps is provided by Alex Starling, writing in the Daily Sceptic, who rightly identifies Hancock as a low-level player whose role was simply to do as he was told, not ask any difficult questions, and (one suspects) be rewarded by making quite a few essentially illegal bucks on the side via dubious procurement contracts.

I find his analysis persuasive, and note with some satisfaction that he does indeed go beyond the simplistic but unsatisfactory notion of "incompetence" and asks the serious question: "Who was the organ-grinder" that issued Matt (directly or indirectly) his instructions?

He is also kind to Chris Whitty, noting that "Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty advised government ministers in February 2020(!) that Covid was not deadly enough to justify fast-tracking vaccines". 

(So what, we may ask, persuaded Chris Whitty to either (a) change his mind abut that or (b) go along with all the subsequent propaganda to the huge detriment of the public and the nation?)

It's hard to deny the logic of Alex's case that a "fantabulous four" effectively conspired (whether accidentally or mendaciously) to drive a particular medical intervention that would ultimately make billions for the providers involved (and it's also hard not to notice that there is one name in particular that crops up in association with all of them).  

So I'm with Alex all the way when he opines that " ... collective action ... that is dictated by a group and imposed on everyone else is tyranny".

"It gets worse if authorities are sufficiently captured by this tyranny such that they deploy subversive psychological weaponry on their citizens and suppress any dissent"

But then he inexplicably (perhaps he had reach his word-count limit!) fails to take the final step and ask the very necessary question: 

How did it come about that theoretically independent authorities around the world (with a few honourable exceptions) were all simultaneously captured by this tyranny?

After all, the trail from the primarily medical to the overtly political is not hard to identify.

Nevertheless, let's not cavil - this article takes the argument much further along the road than some other efforts, and is very welcome.

 

White Teenage Boy? You're a Problem!

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1301

2023-03-17

Teenagers have always had a problem with society's expectations of their interactions with the opposite sex. So it's no surprise if that tradition still lingers, although perhaps it is a disappointment that expectations seem to have become more extreme, perhaps in particular for white indigenous Brits.

"This moral shift has been encouraged by social media and an expansive higher education sector that delights in tearing down the old order. Things we once took for granted are merely ‘constructed’ – and anyone who disagrees is a misogynistic privilege-hoarder"

Sounds a bit extreme doesn't it? But in a world where pre-pubescent kids are expected to attend "Drag Queen Story Hours" it may be that our teenagers are actually getting off lightly.

As far as I can see it's the usual gaslighting technique - encourage them by a constant barrage of LGBTQ+ sexual propaganda and then trip them up over trivial or imagined minor misdemeanours that will only add to their mental confusion.

Some strong-willed boys will see it for what it is, and get themselves into even more hot water by pushing back too hard, whilst others may become cowed and resolve never to speak to a girl again.

Funnily enough this circus seems to be driven by the usual self-righteous lobby groups of dubious funding that claim to speak for society. 

"Look at the ‘Global Boyhood Initiative’, which is writing a new curriculum – currently being piloted in a couple of London schools – on gender equality for children"

And wouldn't you know it, it's all resulting in more business for Big Pharma, courtesy of "our" NHS:

"the NHS has found that the proportion of boys with probable mental health issues has increased by more than 50%, now at nearly one in five. The suicide rate for boys aged 15 to 19 has more than doubled over the past decade"

Not to mention the breakdown of a functioning society, and young adults who have trouble relating to the opposite sex, creating a stable family, and bringing up their own kids.

The Daily Sceptic reports.

So who funds the Global Boyhood Initiative? Well, it's "coordinated by Equimundo".

Who funds Equimundo?

No surprises here, it's a selection of all the usual suspects.

Whilst our schools are in thrall to such well-funded NGOs who have responsibility to neither governments nor parents, they are to all intents and purposes unaccountable. Parents should be up in arms about such involvement.

 

The Transgender Truths that We Need to Know

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1276

2023-03-15

Trans man Scott Nugent explodes the myths and the truths behind the transgender movement, particularly the campaigns to persuade kids that changing their gender is a good idea.

Everybody should watch this twitter video, but be warned - it isn't for the faint of heart.

But it is unmissable.

Clif High - This is How it's Going to Be

Details
Category: Greater Reset!
Hits: 1337

2023-03-15

Mass awakening, fall of the political ideologies, dollar hyper-inflation, collapse of government-funded, Trump Cities, academies collapse, real science rebuilt/revealed, detox from DS, demise of the central banks, Trump, vaccines, greatest ever depression ...

(48 minutes)

 

 

Education, Educashun, Edoocashen

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1299

2023-03-14

We Brits have long looked on as "our" government progressively moved the goalposts to introduce "relationships" learning into our schools curriculum, at each stage widening the definition and insisting on ever earlier engagement with our kids, right down to primary school age. I'm not sure whether "Drag Queen Story Hour" has yet materialised into the curriculum but I've reached the understanding that there are no limits other than those that we the people will set, by protest and non-compliance.

To say that this is an agenda which the vast majority never asked for and which has been introduced as quietly as possible is a reflection of how "our" government operates in multiple areas - in fact this has become (or perhaps always was) their de facto modus operandi. More and more we the people are reduced to mounting spontaneous rearguard actions against their most egregious projects, whist many others less immediately provocative slip through without any great protest. 

We could draw the conclusion that our government is driven by protest groups (he who shouts loudest etc) but if so they are very picky about which protest groups they choose to recognise. Extinction Rebellion and Black Lives Matter are in the favoured category, whereas those who merely protested in favour of keeping their traditional (and lawful) freedoms intact during the lockdowns were dealt with harshly.

All of which makes us wonder - who does "our" government work for, and why? Clearly the answer is "not us".

A salient clue is that many "western" governments seem to be following similar agendas, and we don't have to look far to identify the Universal Nanny responsible.

So are we living already under a one world government? When did we vote for this arrangement?

The Centre for Family and Human Rights explores the UN labyrinth of "progressive universal ethics" - words that many may think have been appropriated to mean the opposite of their original connotation. 

The closest I can come to a description of the UN's preferred "ethics" is by the then Secretary General Kofi Annan given in a speech in 2003 at Tübingen University, Germany - but clearly you should make up your own mind about its relevance to UN ethics today.

“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less"

Obviously a prime candidate to be appointed the next Secretary General.

 

Page 294 of 344