2023-05-06
I have (perhaps somewhat tastelessly) remarked previously that it can be difficult to discern the practical difference between Charles being led by the WEF and the WEF being led by Charles.
It doesn't really matter since they are apparently joined at the hip, and invariably push the totally fascist concept of government and corporate oligarchs uniting their efforts to bring in a global New World Order, all for our own good of course.
You might say that there is nothing intrinsically wrong with that, but there is - and that is that all development, other than that approved by those who rule, is blocked and we all become slaves to the ruling elite. Life in recent centuries has been an uneasy compromise between top-down control and bottom-up innovation, but the paucity of new innovation that actually threatened the elite has been notable. Yes we have had lots of innovation (TV, phones, smartphones, computers, the internet) but all have been useful to increase the powers of persuasion and the propagation of notions that suit the elite.
Even the introduction of cheap air travel has been useful to divert our attention from things that matter to fixing our next week in the sun on a foreign beach.
Rather than making our own entertainment and life, we have been spoon-fed our thoughts values and aspirations by the TV.
No longer. The internet was a possibly fatal miscalculation - it has been turned by a myriad of self-empowered people whose delight is to think for themselves and whose funding was adequate to get them started. It has been turned into a means of propagation of truth and ideas that were hitherto suppressed. This provoked a new level of censorship previously never so obvious, and exposed the limited thinking of our elites as self-serving and utterly detrimental to our futures and to our children's future opportunities.
Now the odds have been evened up, even turned against the elite, as more and more people start to think that maybe the elite are not all they like to crack themselves up to be. A myriad of independent thinkers all doing their own thing is inherently more powerful a crucible for testing new ideas than a few over-mighty decision-makers controlling how everything is done on a one-size-fits-all basis. When those said decision-makers are self-appointed we can be sure that they aren't going to come to any decision that affects their own influence!
So where does our newly anointed King stand on this issue?
One might think that he is above fray, impartial, and leaves all the messy politicking to our representatives in Parliament - but perhaps that is not so.
