Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2023-04-16

I don't doubt that many are heartily sick of hearing about the WHO and it's predilection for promoting its pestilential pandemic panics, but hey, what else are they supposed to do?

The Pandemic Treaty (or "Accord" as we are now supposed to call it) "will not affect individual countries’ sovereignty" according to that panjandrum of interference in global health affairs, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

A bit like the UK joining the EU would not compromise our sovereignty, because it was a democratic decision of Parliament and could be revoked by Parliament. So that's all right then.

And maybe it hints at the correct solution to the WHO imperium.

Be that as it may, it isn't the end of the story because the "Accord" is not the only threat on the books - we also need to consider (but Parliament may or may not debate?) the WHO's proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, which apparently don't need to be signed off by Parliament.

" ... strangely, neither the UK nor any other member states are discussing these amendments which would give the WHO unprecedented powers"

Oh what a tangled web they weave, and of course that's just how "they" like it because nobody in their right mind has the time to devote to investigating and disentangling it. The more complex the web of legalese the more difficult it is for ordinary mortals to navigate and the easier it is for "them" to bamboozle us into submission.

Read all about it.

The solution?

Leave the WHO, leave the UN.

Cut the c**p, just do it.


(This won't do the job, but "every little helps")