2025-08-28
Here is a "peer-reviewed" paper that asserts that the Covid19 jabs qualify as "violations of the Biological Weapons Convention".
No kidding.
They also assert that the "gain of function" artificial "virus" similarly qualifies.
Regular readers will be familiar with our view that the virus was in fact no more than a mind-virus designed to persuade the population at large to accept the real bioweapons: the jabs - after all, why bother changing all the existing tried and tested rules world-wide so as to spectacularly increase the number of deaths attributed to Covid?
If the pandemic had any reality, that would have been visible in the deaths properly attributed by tried and tested convention.
After all, no deaths = no pandemic, so why did "deaths by Covid" have to be mandated by new untried and untested rules?
But no matter, we can't expect academics whose job is to master all the intricacies to step back and look at such an contentious matters as motivation. We agree that the jabs were bioweapons and authorised and administered in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention.
How do we know? Because deaths from all causes remained stubbornly within overall expected variability until the jab roll-outs commenced in 2021 - then they began to rise commensurate with numbers jabbed. Correlation may not prove causation, but it's a smoking gun for the need to investigate.
But nobody world-wide wanted to investigate ...
But the times they are a-changing.
So will the JCVI, MHRA, NHS etc take note?
Answers on a postcard please to the usual address.
