2025-01-27
Legal processes are infamous for lack of rapidity, and it's clear that time is required to make proper investigations and ensure that the arguments are properly presented and logically resolved. When the outcome will affect people's lives, that much can be agreed upon and should be uncontroversial.
It's a great shame therefore that the same thoroughness of approach was evidently not considered applicable to the Covid "pandemic" situation, when the WHO and all national authorities down to your local authority fell over themselves to introduce novel pandemic countermeasures not based on any previously accepted pandemic policies, and then to rush novel technology "vaccines" into the arms of everybody worldwide who could be persuaded or cajoled into accepting them.
That those whose traditional function was to "speak truth unto power" and to "hold authorities to account" should have inverted those functions to uncritically support the authorities "come what may" was indeed a surprise, a surprise that upended many of our prevailing assumptions about how the world worked, and demanded that we review discard and renew our previous assumptions in the cold hard light of evidence.
No such assumption can now be regarded as unchallengeable, all must be opened to scrutiny, and if the both the media and the authorities are unwilling, then the task must fall to us. There is nobody else.
Many stepped forward to do the hard graft, from Dr Reiner Fuellmich and his Court of Public Opinion, to some significant legal moves in Costa Rica, and now to a report from the Alberta Government no less that finds the whole Covid Vaccine group wanting.
This 269 page report merits serious study. Some of the main points to emerge:
" ... every province and territory in Canada had a written pandemic response plan in place prior to COVID-19, as did the federal government. However, none of these plans were utilized during the COVID-19 pandemic "
"Throughout our review, it became evident that Alberta's response to COVID-19 was heavily influenced by national and international interests, with less consideration given to the local context"
"The Colleges placed physicians in a position where they were unable to fully inform patients of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to novel medical interventions, thus compromising the integrity of informed consent."
"The Task Force considers the premise that there existed "widely accepted clinical practice guidelines” for the treatment of COVID-19 viral infection to be unreasonable given that both the pathogen was novel, and the viral evolutionary process resulted in variants. Therefore, it was not possible for there to have been any “established conventional medicine practice.”
"Regulatory bodies should not have the power to stifle scientific inquiry and
debate"
"The failure in epidemic forecasting is an old problem"
"Peak (non-ICU) hospitalizations from initial epidemic models were 1068% to 1329% higher than what was observed"
"Outcome: significant harm to population which has not been tracked.
Improvement: insist on higher standards before approving novel vaccines."
"The COVID-19 Vaccines Were Not Effective in Stopping Transmission"
"It is therefore not accurate to say the original Pfizer Vaccines prevented death compared to
placebo in their own RCT"
"Immediately halt the use of all COVID-19 vaccines without full disclosure to patients regarding both the safety and efficacy issues by their physician"
And much more where these came from.
Perhaps, just perhaps, the logjam is breaking ...
