2022-12-27
Nothing especially new but a useful reminder of how we got here.
"The real-world data on incidence presented in that Vaccine Surveillance Report were highly suggestive of a problem that should have been prioritised for rigorous investigation, not explained away with the flick of a pen"
"UKHSA had resorted to including a stern warning in bold in its section on real-world data:
... These raw data should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness"
"they preferred to believe that it was the real world that was wrong and that their cleverly constructed experimental studies that were right"
"We’re now nine months from that last table of real world data on Covid infection by vaccination status, and in the meantime studies from from around the world continue to suggest that the vaccines increase the risk of Covid infection"
" ...are the vaccines also responsible for a general decrease in immunological protection from other diseases?"
"Are the U.K. experts responsible for advising Government paying any attention whatsoever to these real-world data?"
The Daily Sceptic lays it out.
Worth reading.
