Free Citizen

2025-01-31

Martin Geddes on "The Theology of Q" - with a little help from ChatGPT...

...  and neatly illustrating the differences between spirituality / divinity and theology / religion.

Confused yet?

Good - now include - well, I don't have a name for this, but we might choose "Social construction" or simply "Governmentalism", which is a bit like religion but relies on government dogma rather than religious dogma. It's religion for atheists if you like. It gives us the Green agenda, the UN Agendas, and just like theological religions, there could be as many varieties as you might find irreligious and unspiritual governments, and of course governments can mix and match from any dogmas they choose at any election, which makes for a moveable feast.

Maybe each political party should publish its dogmas as well as its manifesto at election time, then we might have a better idea of what to expect?

...

2025-01-30

Following on from the earlier Brick in the Wall communication (which of course we all watched mulled and eventually fully understood), this video starts by reviewing the Trump "inauguration".

"... they had to break that because there is no corporate and there is no spirit within the corporate..."

"... unfortunately the general public is not aware of the joke... "

Is nothing is as it appears?

I suspect so. The style of delivery is demanding of his viewers, but if we want the truth we need to work at it, as it has been forever obscured beneath multiple layers of fiction.

We are facing the deepest Challenge of the Assumptions! 

Still, one can begin to piece together certain

2025-01-30

Scott Ritter reviews where the Ukraine war (still ongoing post Trump's inauguration!) may be going.

There's a lot of detail here, maybe a lot of posturing, and certainly a lot of counter-posturing.

But if Russia won't talk to Zelensky anyway, who is going to "negotiate"?

And if negotiations are off, then how long can Ukraine withstand the Russian army, with or without Trump's support?

(128 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-29

Are we living in an asylum run by the insane?

After all, in recent years all the usual social and societal norms have been upended, even the rather longstanding biological differences associated with reproduction of the species (and not merely our own species!) have been declared both obsolete and changeable at will, despite the obvious difficulties and dangers of so doing and the consequent damage to the next generation.

Of course the insane are still able to deploy cunning to advance their misguided objectives, which somehow always seem to involve the need to control others who may not be of their persuasion.

Government may therefore be thought the natural habitat of the insane, being the only outfit legally authorised to deploy compulsion on

2025-01-28

To me it's reasonably obvious that, since the only major pandemic of living memory was the so-called 1918 "Spanish Flu" (about which there is much controversy), there is in point of fact no natural reason to suppose that any string of pandemics is likely to afflict the world any time soon.

Some (including ex-Pfizer Dr Mike Yeadon) believe that the Covid "pandemic" was faked. Whilst the  "science" is either convoluted or obfuscated or maybe both, Occam's Razor suggests that the simplest reasoning may be closest to the truth.

The simplest reasoning has nothing to do with the alleged research conducted by "Bat Lady" at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and everything to do with the enormous profits to be made from a "pandemic", real or imagined, that would accrue to the pharmaceutical industry for fake vaccines paid for by governments, or by anybody other than the proposed vaccinees themselves who would be

2025-01-28

The Brownstone Institute reviews a number of "the Donald" 's executive orders that have slapped a wide-ranging communications ban on the US public health bureaucracies.

One might speculate that investigative measures may follow in due course, with consequences that only a few outside of the medical-pharmaceutical-public-health bureaucracies may foresee.

"One Health, as newly embraced by the CDC, amounts to a radical transformation of the basis of social order itself, under the guidance of god-like scientists who alone know how to structure the best life for all living things"

"How it came to be that our main engines of public health came to be captured in whole by such a crazed ideology would require a deep and expansive investigation"

"Now Dr.... heads the agency he defied. He remains in that position until the man once called a “fringe epidemiologist” by the previous head of NIH takes

2025-01-28

This is the latest article from Martin Geddes.

If you only ever read one of his articles, read this one, very carefully, and watch the linked video.

The wheels of justice grind slow, but they grind to dust. But these particular wheels will likely grind much faster than anybody is prepared for - if my understanding is correct.

It illuminates cartels in a whole new light.

Maybe there was a reason that Trump wanted TikTok reinstated in America.

I am no lawyer, and this is not legal advice. Please do your own due diligence.

2025-01-28

"May you live in interesting times"

Are the times interesting enough for you yet?

If not, then perhaps you haven't been paying attention.

Personally I would settle for a little less wind and rain and a bit more global warming, but what do I know?

"Trump intends to use his presidential right to declare a state of emergency (!) thereby providing the conditions to fast-track the plans and put them into action"

"We stand at the brink of what we call here the intelligent age, where artificial intelligence... will fundamentally transform economic systems, business models and personal lifestyles"

"... Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research... has developed a prototype for

2025-01-28

Have you ever wondered (as I have) why archaeologists seem to be obsessed by the idea that ancient sites were used for the purpose of child sacrifice?

There are I suppose two possible explanations for this -

1: these sites really were used for this purpose and the activity must have been quite ubiquitous over different places and ages

2: modern-day archaeologists have an inexplicable but unfounded obsession with the idea that simply won't go away

Now what's past is past and what's done is done, but what if this problem remains endemic in our time also? 

There are concerning indications that this may be the case, and

2025-01-27

"Each covid vaccine that is approved has been through rigorous clinical trials and safety checks".

Well, such was the wording received from my MP when I suggested some years ago that the MHRA might not be sufficiently diligent in the matter of ensuring vaccine safety. It hasn't aged well has it?

The truth is leaking out, even if only anecdotally.

But with MPs in thrall to the MHRA's alleged dedication to public safety, who is to provide a properly researched and audited authoritative opinion?

Welcome to the present - it isn't what we thought it was, and nor are our "independent" regulatory agencies.

2025-01-27

For good or ill, change is sorely needed.

But what kind of change?

Well, there would seem to be only one candidate, a former scourge of the EU Commission, in the frame - Nigel Farage.

A consummate politician who (a bit like Trump) appeals to the man in the street rather than to the political hacks and media pundits.

So can "the Nigel" do for British politics what "the Donald" just did for the mighty United States?

Importantly, can he manage as well as politic? Can he mould public opinion as well as reflect it?

Can he outmanoeuvre the Sir Humphreys of this world and set Parliament back on track as the true representatives of their constituents who really do determine policy?

One thing is for sure - if the Civil Service under his premiership retains its "untouchable" status,

2025-01-27

Clif High lays out his personal view of how the power to control the planet may evolve over the coming year(s).

If we think that the old World Order is somehow going to continue, then we may need to reconsider.

This isn't to suggest that his apocalyptic vision is necessarily incoming either very soon or at all, but it does represent another part of the spectrum of possibilities that we may need to contend with. I judge Clif to be a very experienced guy who has knowledge and abilities well beyond the common man (although he doesn't kindly take prisoners!) so his views are likely worth noting, even if we consider both them and his style of presentation to be politically incorrect.

2025-01-27

Given that much of what appears in the press can no longer be taken at face value, and every politician worthy of note (or not) seems to be working to a concealed agenda (or not), it's become more or less impossible to come to conclusions about what any one of them may be up to, let alone forecast how the whole may resolve to bring us our future.

Especially given the breakneck speed at which the new Trump administration is breaking ground and breaking politicians such as presidents and prime ministers alike. It was hard enough to keep up before 20th January. 

Let's just say that this is a time when we all need a certain amount of faith that the Universe has our best interests at heart.

"Trust and verify" as used to be the motto of UN disarmament inspectors...

This for what it may be worth is Ben's viewpoint that he feels able to release in public this week. Whether we agree with everything is up to us... 

2025-01-27

Legal processes are infamous for lack of rapidity, and it's clear that time is required to make proper investigations and ensure that the arguments are properly presented and logically resolved. When the outcome will affect people's lives, that much can be agreed upon and should be uncontroversial.

It's a great shame therefore that the same thoroughness of approach was evidently not considered applicable to the Covid "pandemic" situation, when the WHO and all national authorities down to your local authority fell over themselves to introduce novel pandemic countermeasures not based on any previously accepted pandemic policies, and then to rush novel technology "vaccines" into the arms of everybody worldwide who could be persuaded or cajoled into accepting them.

That those whose traditional function was to "speak truth unto power" and to "hold authorities to account" should have inverted those functions to uncritically support the authorities "come what may" was indeed a surprise, a surprise that

2025-01-27

Martin Geddes provokes our little grey cells once more.

His journey from matters material/commercial through matters legal and on to matters spiritual has been a fascinating tale, and has exposed how he considers that the matters legal may conflict with both the spiritual and the inappropriate implementation of the legal.

Javier Milei encapsulated the folly of trying to legislate for every possibility when he noted "the infinite expansion of the aberrant state" in his recent address to Davos 2025, although he probably had more in mind than just rules and regulations (the State being very prone these days to extend its reach into control of matters parental and much else besides).

Jesus himself set the scene where the Bible records

2025-01-24

Javier Milei addresses Davos, 2025 style.

And as if that wasn't enough, a free extra bonus appearance by the new Boss, Donald J. Trump at 27 minutes.

(70 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-23

Has Trump overreached himself?

Does picking a fight with President Putin bring peace in the Ukraine any closer?

Does imposing tariffs on the BRICS solve the problem of the weakening US dollar?

Set against Trump's history of coming back from the brink, these moves look odd. Nevertheless, he isn't negotiating with the opposition here, he is more likely setting the mood music for the guidance of US opinion.

"Everything that Trump's doing is just completely contradictory"

So, perhaps he is just making a lot of noise that the BRICS know amounts to very little... but maybe elements within the US do not.

Or perhaps his primary target is China, whose current exports to the US are probably too large for them to lose on day one to tariffs, so they may need to reduce their prices temporarily whilst they seek alternative

2025-01-23

"Chris Whitty... told the Covid Inquiry this week that the decision to mandate Covid jabs was “100 per cent a political one” and he was "sceptical" of it"

"Has the public health establishment at least learned something from the last few years?"

If nothing else, these last few years have permitted the "public health establishment" in all its varied forms to demonstrate that they are totally immune to all criticism, whether justified or not. Immune even to the Nuremberg Codes that declared unequivocally that anybody to be subjected to a medical experiment must be (a) fully informed of the risks (b) free to decline to take part. They were coerced at every turn into taking an experimental intervention described as a "vaccine" which was in fact a largely untested gene therapy that turned out to confer no stoppage of onward transmission and negligible effective

2025-01-22

From the name itself, one might think of UFOs / UAPs, or some science-fiction portal concept. The truth seems to be more prosaic, but just as topical and probably just as much misunderstood:

AI

But not just any AI...

Conspiracy Sarah asks the relevant question - what could (possibly) go wrong?

Does Trump believe this stuff?

Or is he indulging his favoured tactic of putting likely miscreants squarely into the limelight for investigation by the public? And if he isn't, it's a good bet that there will be no shortage of public volunteers who will oblige anyway, given the current reputation of the mRNA shots

2025-01-22

Scott Ritter reviews the state of play in the Middle East for the Schiller Institute.

It's complicated, but the current situation, whilst not solving the immediate problem, may open additional options...

(11 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.