Free Citizen

2021-01-20

The third option (not to be confused with Tony Blair's "third way"!).

Roll back from the "Municipal United States" and the "Territorial United States" (foreign Federal Subcontractors) and deal with the people of America.

"The details of their service contracts are published as The Constitution of the United States and The Constitution of the United States of America. And both these foreign Federal Subcontractors are ultimately owned and operated by the Pope"

"The actual American Government has stirred its stumps and there is no longer any reason for anyone to surmise, claim, or presume that the Municipal United States and its Board of Directors is “representing” us, or that the Territorial Government —-as the Pledge of Allegiance says, is “standing for” us — when our States of the Union are in Session"

2021-01-20

The 1776 Report.

The declared purpose of the President’s Advisory 1776 Commission is to

“enable a rising generation to understand the history and principles of the founding of the United States in 1776 and to strive to form a more perfect Union.”

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children
and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free. - Ronald Reagan"

This could usefully be read by anybody who wishes to understand the makings of the most powerful nation on earth, and to understand what

2021-01-18

It's not often that I feel led to delve into matters ecclesiastical, but Lockdown Septics have I think hit a nail squarely upon the head.

My own religious affiliation was to the C of E (church of everyone) in whose loving embrace I was brought up - and very thankful I am for that upbringing as it has been from time to time comforting to remember the prayers and bible passages that were by rote inevitably instilled into that mysterious space between my ears. 

My own feeling is that in times to come when the true nature of the religious hierarchies of the various Churches becomes public knowledge, those worshippers of the said Churches will be at a loss, whilst those who put their faith in the true God will have their faith confirmed.

Lockdown Sceptics however are pointing to an unsuspected new Church on the block, to which the old C of E has implicitly given its blessing. The new Church of the NHS, with millions of worshippers putting their trust in

2021-01-16

The material in this article is not new - but it has been determinedly ignored by health services and governments worldwide for many months.

Can't be true then?

Green Med Info has written a great article which explains the whole scenario. They also include two videos which cover the same ground, if you prefer to watch rather than read:

Short video:

Like / Dislike this video here.  Longer video:

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

Nigel towards the end draws attention to the "covert intelligence bill" currently wending its way quietly through Parliament.

i don't remember this Bill featuring in any reports from the main-stream media but I may be mistaken.

2021-01-07

Brian, I think you forgot to mention that the government has still not published even a rudimentary assessment of the damage caused by lock-down restrictions, which is surely unforgivable after all this time and only-too-real experience.

No matter - I cannot disagree with your viewpoint, so eloquently expressed.

2021-01-04

The AIER publishes a comparative piece reflecting on the similarities between the American governments' response to the Covid crisis, and their response to the crisis in Vietnam and the subsequent war.

"The similarities between our misguided responses to Vietnam and the coronavirus are striking"

"... President Johnson’s advisors refused to question a course of strategy and consider alternatives rigorously"

One can see their point.

But this doesn't merely apply to America - it certainly applies in the UK, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Canada...  the list goes on.

How realistic is it to suppose that the same group-think can simultaneously arise across much of the world? Would guidance from the WHO have anything to do with

2020-12-30

This is absolutely a message for our times - don't miss it, and if you saw it back in the summer, watch it again - remind yourself what life is all about (90 minutes).

Thanks to Del Bigtree of the Highwire for this outstanding interview.

Happy New Year!

2020-12-28

I'm fast running our of original comment to make on the Covid restrictions, so I'll just say that it's good to see Brian back on Youtube (long may it last?) and I'll let this one speak for itself:

Like / Dislike this video here.

2020-12-26

I might subtitle this "You don't know what you had until it's gone" - what made the British Isles so special in the world?

Like / Dislike this video here.

2020-12-24

Now you and I and the rest of the normal world (not to mention almost all epidemiologists to date) have no doubt grown up with and accepted the concept of herd immunity - if enough people get exposure to a disease (either through catching it and recovering or through vaccination) then we become largely immune to it, and as more and more people achieve this happy immunity the pathogen has more and more trouble finding susceptible hosts to infect, so that the disease soon enough peters out.

So the recent report from the AIER comes as something of a surprise . . .

Does the WHO now somehow conclude that herd immunity can only be achieved through vaccination after all? This seems an extraordinary proposition that requires some explanation if we are to accept it.

The AIER has the story.

...

2020-12-24

The latest Tier4 tightenings of the Lockdown screws it now transpires may have been influenced by one Prof Neil Ferguson of Imperial College - but wait, wasn't his original contribution to the Government's Covid project discredited and didn't he resign from his advisory positions?

Maybe not - the Spectator has the story.

Call me old-fashioned, but doesn't this tell us all we need to know about this government's choice of "scientific" advisors?

2020-12-20

The AIER produces a quite arresting analysis of the events of 2020, taking an encompassing view of the various subjects (I'm not sure that they all strictly qualify as "sciences").

Quite rightly they take the proponents of lock-downs and other regressive measures to task:

"Yes, of course we must follow science, but we must do so in every field, not only in epidemiology but also in politics, economics, and philosophy"

"To be scientific in every field means to incorporate both theory and practice, to assess all real and relevant factors, not just a select few of them; it means cultivating a perspective that is likewise impartial (not biased), comprehensive (not narrow) view, and proportional (not imbalanced)"

A worthy review of how the science has

2020-12-20

How can we "know" what is going on?

Well, first-hand experience is probably the most reliable method - anything we can see, touch, hear, taste or smell is a good candidate for a high degree of certainty. If we hear someone say something and watch their lips move then we have two sources of information and the one (hopefully) corroborates the other - it doesn't get much more certain than that. However, it still doesn't vouch for the veracity of what was said, only that the person said it.

Second-hand experience is what we usually have to work with - we can see something in a newspaper, watch a report on TV, and so on, but these could all be easily faked. So we have to rely on other factors to corroborate the original, and here we come up against the problems and opportunities of trust.

If we trust the source of the report then we are likely to believe it. If we don't trust the source then we will be sceptical unless we can see corroborative reports

2020-12-18

One of the things that has surprised me this autumn is the number of different sources of unrelated categories of information that are all coming around to the central question of our time:-

What the COVID is going on?!

We have seen offerings from Green Med Info (an alternative health site), from news journalists (sadly now few and far between) from independent individuals

2020-12-15

Many thanks to Lockdown Sceptics for this link:

Like / Dislike this video here.

More about this performer here.

2020-11-27

Lockdown Sceptics publishes an article by well qualified authors (including Dr Mike Yeadon) which forensically explains how reliance on the PCR test is producing a "pseudo-epidemic".

"A false positive pseudo-epidemic is a well described phenomenon in the medical literature which results in an exponential rise in diagnosed cases and deaths but no excess deaths. PCR testing is renowned for it and the “second wave” of Swine Flu in 2009 was entirely a false positive pseudo-epidemic only stopped by stopping the testing"

This is the simple key point at issue which fatally undermines the whole government-by-big-pharma covid narrative, and the cogent arguments presented in this article deserve everybody's full attention, especially as we learn today that "end of lockdown" most emphatically does not involve any significant relaxation of