2022-11-17

We thought it would never happen, but maybe elections (no matter how badly run) do matter after all.

The "national emergency" that turned out to be for a virus that was no more deadly than the annual flu has been relentlessly extended every time it threatened to expire, for no obvious reason (other than to prolong the legal ability to push vaccines under an Emergency Use Authorisation).

"The Senate passed a measure in a 62–36 bipartisan vote to end the emergency, which was initially declared on March 13, 2020"

...thus putting them on a collision course with "President" Biden, who has threatened a veto. I wouldn't doubt that the new House of Representatives will align with the Senate on this issue, so we'll see how long the Pretendency holds out.

High time.

2022-11-15

La Quinta Columna (The Fifth Column) is a Spanish site (but you can select English language at the top right when the page opens) that has been quietly at the forefront of the scientific / technical evaluation of "the jabs" with particular reference to graphene and its derivatives. 

If anyone is in any doubt about these mRNA shots, this is the site to put those doubts to bed. 

If you can't find what you are looking for here, then you may well not find it anywhere.

For example, you can download their Technical Report GRAPHENE DETECTION IN COVID19 VACCINES BY MICRO-RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY (in Google English), or download a list of articles

2022-11-14

The General Medical Council is the regulatory body  

"... responsible for setting the standards for medical students and doctors... "

You might think that this is the doctors' professional association with members elected by the doctors themselves...  but it appears that you would be wrong.

A quick investigation of their web-site reveals that it is rather coy about how the Council chair and members get their councillorships, so being intrigued by this rather basic omission I did an internet search and came up with a 2019 advertisement in the Sunday Times for a Council Member (£18K annually for 'up to' 3 days per month, since you ask):

"We are seeking to appoint a medical member for our governing Council"

Equally strangely, the said "We" are not unidentified. Is it

2022-11-10

We would all hope so, indeed we should demand so, since nurses need numerical ability in order to get the decimal point in the right place when administering drugs to patients - who may well not think (for any number of reasons) to check their work in this department.

Startlingly, some experienced nursing professionals, writing in the Daily Sceptic, fear that nursing numeracy cannot at all be taken for granted.

"When George Orwell’s Big Brother in Nineteen Eighty-Four taught that two plus two equals five, the point was that authoritarians can make people believe something they know to be untrue. If nurses are innumerate, a pandemic can be presented with whatever numbers that the Government wants to induce fear and compliance"

"Don't be ridiculous!" I hear you say, but - "How many trotted out the mantra about the COVID-19

2022-11-09

I hate to keep banging this drum but whilst the powers-that-be continue, so must we.

The Daily Sceptic brings up a useful article (actually one among several in today's email) which reviews the reasons why some people may not be too keen on Covid vaccines, or even on vaccines in general.

Vaccines have the distinction that they are a class of medical interventions that are routinely given to healthy people who are not sick - yet they pose risks to health that every authority acknowledges, in principle if not in practice.

This means that any justification for such an approach must rely on good statistics properly and very carefully (it's a minefield for experts, let alone the man on the Clapham omnibus) gathered and analysed over the requisite period of time. This was clearly not practicable for the Covid shots

2022-11-08

ICAN draws attention to another side-effect of the jabs in kids - Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). Whilst similar to the flu and not normally problematic, RSV can be serious in the "very young".

Not that that has been recognised by the regulatory authorities...

Read the ICAN Legal Update.

2022-11-05

"I will praise You, for I am fearfully, wonderfully made; Your works are marvellous and my heart perceives it well" - Psalm 139:14 (The Keys of the Kingdom Holy Bible)

Just now though many people are not feeling quite so wonderfully made, for all sorts of reasons - poor nutrition, misguided lifestyle, impact of toxins of all kinds, allergies, you name it.

Speaking personally, I only turned my own health around when I realised that I needed to start forming my own judgements and making my own health decisions. After all, my doctor's role is to inform and advise, not to decide - that's my job! I haven't looked back, except in some relief that things turned out so well and happily, so quickly.

(44 minutes)

2022-11-04

Including who was in charge of the pandemic response, apparently.

Of course the lead was taken by America, but evidence has been uncovered that the Anthony Fauci - Deborah Birx duality was not in charge.

It seems that the legal situation was changed, effectively by presidential fiat:

"An astonishing Government document dated March 13th 2020 ... reveals that United States policy in response to SARS-CoV-2 was set not by the public health agencies... but rather by the National Security Council"

"The NSC does not include as regular attendees any representatives from public health related agencies"

"... on March 18th 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) – which comprises the CDC, NIAID, NIH and other ... agencies – had no official leadership role in pandemic response"

"On

2022-11-04

The Friday wrap-up with Greg Hunter of USA Watchdog...

According to Greg, it's all coming down and the collapse will only gain speed.

(You can skip the first 2 minutes 30 of adverts if you wish)

If the following message on social media is correct, he's right:

2022-11-03

And now for something completely different: 

"a new poll finds large parts of the public clamouring for new restrictions this winter. As many as 42% back the return of social distancing, while 20% want to reimpose the Rule of Six immediately and over 60% want mask mandates back on public transport"

A dark winter indeed!

I have to wonder about this poll's selection criteria. Was it properly randomised? Did it include the appropriate percentage of small business owners (for example)? And perhaps MPs? Certainly the fearful and well-off seem to be very well represented.

"A YouGov survey this week shows the same lingering authoritarianism"

Are we all doomed?

...

2022-11-01

Bio-labs are in the news again, this time reportedly at our very own Imperial College, London.

IC have denied the "gain of function" accusation, but in that case it's not at all clear what the purpose of the project was:

"Imperial defended its research. A spokesperson said: 'This government-backed research used viruses no more pathogenic than those already circulating within the population and will provide crucial insights that support government decision-making on how to manage the pandemic"

Surely in these matters, in order to maintain public trust, transparency is essential, especially in times when a not inconsiderable portion of the public already have considerable distrust in both IC and the government.

Technocracy News and Trends

10/31/2022

In a seriously well-argued presentation to a Cambridge Union debate, Laura Dodsworth blesses us by filing her transcript on Substack.

Yes, primarily she has the Covid-type experts in her cross-hairs but the psychology experts in the infamous (and if it's not infamous yet then it should be) nudge unit come in hard on their heels (to mix my metaphors).

It's a polite but uncompromising indictment of government by "experts", but it's also a criticism of the many who, despite all the signals that conflicted with seemingly everything we should have known, still meekly, even gladly, did as we were told.

A tour de force.

If I have a criticism (yes I do) it is

2022-10-30

Wear masks, don't wear masks, lock down, don't lock down, social distance etc etc.

Now the Daily Sceptic tells us how those who hope we have short memories are trying to spin away the blame.

It wasn't the non-pharmaceutical interventions that did the damage, but the fear of the virus... so it was our fault for believing the incessant fear-mongering?

If this wasn't published in a reputable journal (!) I would think it a well-timed way over-the-top outrageous spoof, but these days one has to move with the times and recognise that what passes for politics is actually just attempted mind-control. If the peasants are revolting against it, then mind-control harder!

Or have I flipped and become mentally incoherent in a totally unwarranted search for the last vestiges of sanity, where

2022-10-28

Or, to put it another way, even if they don't kill or disable you, you still are not out of the woods.

"New evidence has emerged that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are routinely injuring the heart of all vaccine recipients, raising further questions about their safety and their role in the recent elevated levels of heart-related deaths"

But is this really an effect of the Covid infection, as those who can see no vaccine harm under any circumstances might suggest? Not so fast...

"... even though Australia had not had significant Covid (only 30,000 reported infections and 910 deaths) prior to mid-2021, it still saw a trend in excess non-Covid deaths beginning in June 2021"

The Daily Sceptic brings us

2022-10-26

The Daily Sceptic highlights some official data that demonstrates exactly why we (and our friends and acquaintances) should perhaps be leery of getting any more jabs.

No conspiracy theories, no dubious medicos that want to plough their own furrow, no unauthorised data sources.

"Information like this seems to me to be the kind of thing people are looking for, particularly now as they become increasingly hesitant about getting ever more shots of vaccine"

A useful article that many of us could perhaps adapt to meet our own needs to communicate within our circles.

Useful not just  because it provides a handle on the effectiveness of the treatment, but also because it highlights a respectable practical and superior

2022-10-24

Today's debate in Parliament on the safety of the jabs.

Readers will form their own conclusions about the level of interest that MPs in general display on this topic.

Starting with what some may consider a totally complacent presentation on behalf of the official position, this debate does include some well argued points presented by those MPs who made the effort to attend:

"Let's look at the facts, and not just be beholden to the MHRA... " 

"The Government seems to be in denial about the risks from these vaccines"

"The Government refuses to provide specialist help for these vaccine victims"

"Many people now would not touch a booster with a barge-pole - and I include myself amongst those... "

"Large numbers of doctors and health

2022-10-23

The Daily Sceptic reminds us that the EU can be relied upon to completely destroy civilisation as we once knew it.

Not content with wiping out it's energy supply chains it now sets itself up for round two of medico-maniacal measures to stifle its populations and small businesses through new winter lockdowns - no doubt in the noble cause of saving both ourselves and the planet.

I suppose if we all have to stay at home then keeping the exterior doors shut will have the minimal effect of retaining a smidgeon more precious but hard-come-by warmth, but the cost would be insufferable and I can't see the Europeans standing for it, "legally-binding treaty" or not.

Meanwhile in the UK once the Tories have completed their implosion and let Sir Kier loose at the controls, we too will be subject to the "lockdown, lockdown harder" mentality to "save the UKHSA" whilst he "negotiates" our happy return into the EU fold - on the EU's terms of course. Goodbye Pound

2022-10-22

The title sounds a bit melodramatic, but in the light of

(a) the microscopically insignificant risk of Covid-19 to babies, toddlers, and children of all ages, and 

(b) the vastly higher risk of horrible adverse events including but not limited to death, blindness, heart problems, cancers, and almost any other ailment you can think of...

I recommend that this article should be taken very seriously.

See also the view from the U.K. Medical Freedom Alliance.

Look at it this way:

What is the upside possibility of benefit?

2022-10-22

No one theme dominates this discourse, but he does touch on a few current issues that may be of interest:

(49 minutes)

2022-10-21

Another "Gain of Function" virus project, that has had little to no publicity, emerges.

Should we be worried? Since this modified virus has not (yet) been released, and as the original virus on which it was based was hardly more lethal than the flu, perhaps not.

It must be far more important to halt the mRNA gene editing shots that are still being rolled out to age groups that can overall only be harmed by them. So is this latest revelation primarily a distraction exercise at the moment?

And BTW, how did they know about the "omicron variant" back in 2020? Was any of this pandemic stuff unplanned?

(22 minutes)

...