2025-01-28
Have you ever wondered (as I have) why archaeologists seem to be obsessed by the idea that ancient sites were used for the purpose of child sacrifice?
There are I suppose two possible explanations for this -
1: these sites really were used for this purpose and the activity must have been quite ubiquitous over different places and ages
2: modern-day archaeologists have an inexplicable but unfounded obsession with the idea that simply won't go away
Now what's past is past and what's done is done, but what if this problem remains endemic in our time also?
There are concerning indications that this may be the case, and we have noted a few of them before (see more under our Child Abuse menu option).
Faced with all the evidence it is perhaps necessary to consider that this is a problem with ancient origins, still continuing in the dark shadows of our modern age, and there have been well reported instances allegedly involving powerful people in high places in the UK, notably such as Jimmy Savile, not to mention a variety of MPs over the years.
There have even been assertions of "Satanic Ritual Abuse" which are obviously difficult to prosecute.
Still, the Epstein and Diddy cases in the US clearly indicate that at least some of these instances involve groups of perpetrators conspiring to commit dreadful crimes, possibly with the objective of snaring people for the purposes of blackmail. Say for instance a Senator, Judge, or Congressman. Control enough politicians by this means and it's clear where this might lead. As well as making judicial convictions very hard to secure (the Epstein client list is still seemingly under wraps), we cannot even rule out a hitherto unsuspected aspect to the much-vaunted transatlantic "special relationship".
Does this open the possibility of vastly more serious operations than previously suspected?
Today we bring you an article from the Brownstone Institute which discusses the issue against the settings of (a) today's politics and (b) today's societal norms.
It makes for hard reading precisely because it places us all on the spot - if the authorities won't address the issue with determination, then what can the man and woman on the Clapham omnibus do to move the issue into public consciousness to the point where the responsible authorities actually take ownership of the issue?
But what if these same "responsible authorities" are actually part of the problem?
