2025-10-12

Released today, a 2½ hr video for those who like their boredom monotone.

Dr Joseph Sansone comments and links.

I won't repeat all the arguments here, it's become too tedious, but you can watch the video below, and there is plenty more background at Interest of Justice, and on our own Covid menu page.

(2 hrs 31 mins)

2025-10-12

Feeling stressed out? Bad Day histrionics? Can't cope?

Well, if you're like me (you do have two arms, two legs, a head with two eyes, two ears, one nose etc?) then maybe this is for you.

Listening to the right music can work wonders with your mood, putting you up for dancing like a Dervish, waltzing around the ballroom, working up a brisk concentration, or just plain letting go for a blessed interlude where thoughts quieten and (if you want) relaxation rules.

It needn't stop you working (I'm listening as I write this) but it does calm and soothe to excellent effect. Try it when you go to bed and you'll likely wake up as relaxed as you have never been (and your ailments may have measurably improved to boot!).

...

2025-10-12

Martin updates us on the sorry story (The Trial from Appleby Horse Fair) that exposes the charades that our "system of justice" deploys to bamboozle and exhaust us into compliance with its illegal and unlawful demands.

Illegal because they do not reference real Courts as laid down by law (even where such real Courts may exist!) and unlawful because they are essentially fraudulent, and fraud vitiates everything.

This is his public record of these unfathomable framings, and how the system seeks at every turn to to evade its responsibilities and prevent a challenge from being heard in a real court. Perhaps they really do have something to hide?

Martin 's Public Record.

2025-10-12

"The more chaos, the better his odds..."

Is the new ruckus between China and Trump a sign of what is going on in Chinese leadership circles?

If your enemies are in the ascendant, bowl them a googly for which they are unprepared... and the 4th Plenum is critical.

Xi JinPing may not be done quite yet, and Trump now has a big paddle with which to stir the troubled waters. Will he use it? Silly question!

(62 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-10-11

I think that this just about sums up the mood of many, probably the mood of the Nation.

One might well expect organised crime to be attracted to money and power like flies to road kill, but even if our politics isn't significantly corrupt (what is to prevent it?), it certainly isn't working. 

This site has no party political allegiance - as far as we are concerned no MP can serve two masters, so he must choose to represent those who control his Party, or to represent his constituents. Only the unctuously slippery can manage to appear to represent both, and any MP who values his tenure must obey his party whips.

Nevertheless "it takes two to tango", and those constituents who make no effort to seriously understand and engage in politics hugely outnumber those that do get involved. Until "we the people" organise to take on a much bigger involvement, it's hard to see how the current system can be reformed.

Free Speech Landmark Ruling by Crown Court

2025-10-09

Alert readers may notice the additional quote in our site masthead!

Clif High is an extraordinary polymath of vast learning and exceptional life experience. Following his teachings is also an exceptional experience, by which perhaps many may be unpersuaded, but which I find logically compelling as his notions fit in well with my intuitive (yet not so far very practical!) understanding of how this universe works.

The critical question (which perhaps Science as we know it gets backwards) is:

"Which acts as foundation for the other: consciousness or 3-dimensional matter?"

You may agree I think that the question is fundamental!

If consciousness is the foundation of matter, then it follows that if we wish to understand matter then we must first understand consciousness, whereas if somehow consciousness arises from matter then we must first understand the material

2025-10-09

Did Wilhelm Reich photograph living viruses in the 1930s?

Regular readers will be familiar with our (and Mike Yeadon's) suggestion that modern-day viruses are a hoax put about by the industry in order to justify injecting the healthy with their products - the healthy being a much larger population than the already sick, and thus present the potential for bigger profits by several orders of magnitude!

If Wilhelm was photographing live viruses in vivo, (and destroying them with pin-point accuracy by bio resonance!) doesn't that prove us wrong?

Unlikely for several reasons - but primarily that Big Pharma went to some trouble to ensure that his discoveries were never to be developed, because they would have made the pharmaceutical industry obsolete. Big Pharma's version of virology isn't based on Wilhelm Reich's research, so if his story is correct, their's is BS.

2025-10-09

So here's the geopolitical news re the Middle East of yesteryear, direct from "Whitehall"...looks like nothing much has changed, other than things getting immeasurably worse.

(4 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-10-09

Come on Martin Geddes, don't hang back, tell us what you really think.

"Proof now follows punishment. Judicial names have become decorative. Mercy and proportionality are excised as inefficiencies. The law that once restrained power now operationalises extraction"

But they'd never get away with it!

"In the vocabulary of legality, it all sounds reasonable. In the language of conscience, it is extortion with paperwork"

So Justice is now subordinate to Jim Hacker's Department of Administrative Affairs?

"Yes, Prime Minister, it's so much more convenient and streamlined... "

2025-10-09

The country has always run on lawful consent.

No consent, no obligation.

But did we not consent to Parliament doing as it wanted when we participated at the last election?

Well, there's the rub. The nub of the problem.

We as a population may have expressed a wish (assuming that the election result wasn't fiddled, as it now appears the US elections were at times fiddled), but how to refute UN-WEF policies when all major parties support the same? It would require a monumental public awakening to get everyone to spoil their ballot and declare "None of these thank you".

So such "consent" is at best dodgy, and in practice impractical. And even if we may be presumed to vote on the basis of politicians pre-election promises and manifestos, we all know how well carried through those promises turn out to be post-election.

The What? The Internet Governance Forum? What's That?

2025-10-09

Martin Geddes once more, this time trying to give us insight into the primary question of our time:

"What the Hell is going on?"

Making sense of the news (from wherever we may glean it) has never been more tricky - and certainly many believe that we can no longer (if ever we could) rely on the august probity of the BBC to interpret the news for us.

Take for example the Charlie Kirk phenomenon. That really does look like the proverbial rabbit-hole where it seems impossible to sort the truth from the multiple apparent misdirections.

So perhaps we need an investigatory framework within which to marshal the facts, the assertions, and indeed the improbable but not definitively excluded possibilities.

"You won’t need a PhD to join: reference frameworks and

2025-10-09

"Abuse" can occur at many levels right through from the Global to the personal (OK, the pedantic may want to replace "global" by "galactic" or some such, but you get the point).

"The Matrix" is a systematic abuse of the population at large through widespread application of  deceit, fear, and misdirection, through media either unwitting, careless, or complicit.

Within this system we inevitably end up in one of a number of different role types (perhaps several types over different times and circumstances) which Martin Geddes has identified with a little help from AI.

It's useful to understand what is going on here, as it may help us to recognise what is going on in our own circumstances. Although I don't suppose that the list is exhaustive, it's a start.

"The purpose is not to assign blame, but to give you

2025-10-08

Alex Krainer spells it out.

Again. But maybe it needs saying once more, just to be sure.

(49 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-10-08

Prof Jiang Xueqin talks to Danny Haiphong about the major geopolitical question just now - when and how might the Israel - Iran war be resumed?

And where will the US stand in such an event?

"... if it does that, then it's basically WW3... "

"... Britain is responsible for many of the global conflicts that have occurred the last 20 years... "

(93 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-10-07

"Europe is about to collapse and the United States is washing its hands of it"

Well, if the EU is truly intent on picking a fight with its easterly neighbour, what is the US supposed to do about it?

"Western elites in Brussels, Berlin, and Paris are pushing Vladimir Putin into a corner — leaving him no choice but to defend Mother Russia"

"The elites want war without regard to reality"

"A top US general now says that NATO could seize Kaliningrad in just a matter of hours... "

(15 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-10-07

The latest on the usual EU situation...

... from our usual correspondent!

(21 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-10-07

If I am confused about the alleged shooting of Charlie Freak, then I'd bet that many are also confused. It looked to me like a psy-op - merely the most recent of many - and likely perpetrated by one of the usual array of suspects. For all I know, "Charlie Freak" may himself have been a psy-op.

This is a second outing by Martin Geddes into the deep uncharted waters of "Charlie Freak" (see the companion piece here). And yes, he dives deep, yet not to uncover the truth, but to reveal the significance. Or not - it's for us to decide.

"... this isn’t mere strategy; it’s the soul’s field-manual. Warfare’s theater doubles as ego’s quiet audit under divine direction"

Ready? 

2025-10-07

If you're a general or maybe a politician, established habits of geopolitics and warfare die hard, and any incoming alien group (unless it arrives uninvited in small inflatables from mid-Channel) will likely be taken as a hostile force and met with military action. To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

But maybe this doesn't present the best way to interact with "aliens" that come our way.

For a start, whencever they come from, their technology is likely to be vastly more developed than ours, so they will assuredly have sent their scouts in advance, and will know to bring some primitive inflatables with them on a calm day. If they are friendly.

If not, we will have no answers should they decide to rumble us. Our best course therefore is likely to be to hold the military, offer respectful friendliness, and to try to learn as much as possible from them in