Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2021-09-30

The Daily Sceptic highlights a report by the ONS (Office of National Statistics) that purports to show two results that seem to contradict all previous studies - that Masks cut infection rates by half and that natural immunity is inferior to vaccine-bestowed immunity.

The study makes use of three separate models, stacked upon each other, to reach these conclusions.

It has been long established that a positive test result is not evidence of detection of the virus.

I have drawn attention to the likely difference between "models" and "science" previously. In this instance I suspect a yawning chasm between the two.

Add to this the known unreliability of the PCR tests upon which the datasets are based and it seems abundantly clear that the ONS is guilty of either gross incompetence or carelessness (they are supposed to be competent statisticians) or an attempt to mislead the public (ie: fraud).

Read the article and form your own view.