2025-06-29
There is a movement to recognise and ban mRNA injections as bioweapons.
You might think that banning a bioweapon isn't contentious - and you might be right, so the real question boils down to something like "is the mRNA type of injection a bioweapon"?
But what is an "mRNA" injection? We might know what the pharmaceutical companies say is in these injections, but there are plenty of suggestions that these companies are not truthful.
It seems to me that the real problem is not whether or not they should be classified as bioweapons, but whether or not they are "harmful", and that in itself now appears to be a question that can indeed be endlessly debated, despite (or maybe because of) the existence of very expensive "independent" regulators who many believe have conflicts of interest (seen and/or unseen) with those that they purport to "regulate".
The blunt truth is that we must all make up our own minds as best we can, and act accordingly.
If (despite the mountains of evidence to the contrary) you believe that persuading our government to do the right thing is an appropriate and useful course of action, then you may well find the linked articles of interest.
Alternatively you may consider that governments as we now know them are not useful, and you will likely find a more productive use for your time and effort.
