2024-05-17
Leaving aside the inconvenient fact that without carbon dioxide, vegetation would not grow and we would all perish from starvation, it could still be just about plausible that too much CO2 would be in some way damaging ... for instance, if we had 100% CO2 then we would all suffocate for lack of oxygen.
Happily, in the presence of sunlight and green vegetation, 100% CO2 would be impossible, since the vegetation would convert it to oxygen in short order (probably strangling us within its infinitely-enfolding tendrils in the process). All without even considering the similar aquatic life that also processes CO2 in the oceans.
Which rather begs the question: if the vegetation (farmed or natural) already performs the carbon capture process for free, what need to invent an artificial capture process?
And is it really wise to even consider blocking the sun (chemtrails etc) thus limiting the power of vegetation to convert the said CO2 to oxygen?
Well, perhaps if that artificial process would do it quicker and more cheaply (should that be possible) and give us the same amount of free oxygen ... whilst not actually producing any CO2 itself ... then we might possibly break even with Mother Nature or even effect a small improvement.
But perhaps there's none so stupid as politicians who would convince us of anything for power.
