2023-12-31
Continuing the Great TV Licensing Saga, Martin Geddes outlines his case against the Courts for permitting Capita to act as principle in the case of Geddes vs the BBC (AKA "TV Licensing").
It revolves around the identity of "TV Licensing" - is it Capita (a BBC subcontractor) or is it the BBC?
If the latter, then Capita would have no standing in the courts to sue on behalf of "TV Licensing", which is alleged to be a mere trademark of the BBC, and thus of itself not a legal entity.
And Martin has copious evidence to prove his point.
Legal arcanery? Upon such does justice hang in our courts of law. Words are important - a word out of place may invalidate a contract.
