2021-11-02
HART (The Health Advisory & Recovery Team) reviews the FDA's recent decision to issue an EUA (emergency use authorisation) for the Pfizer Covid19 vaccine in 5 to 11 yr olds.
They compare the hypothetical expected rates of ICU admissions and deaths from Covid against the expected risks of Myocarditis as a result of vaccination.
The trial investigation was of course run by the vaccine manufacturer Pfizer. There is no indication that it was independently supervised or audited. Indeed, the published reasoning includes these caveats:
"A descriptive efficacy analysis was also based on this cohort; at the time of this Briefing Document was prepared, FDA has not fully verified the underlying data or Pfizer-BioNTech’s conclusions from this analysis"
"Data verification is in process, but not yet finished at the time this briefing book was completed"
It is clear from the published reasoning (download) that the sample size upon which the assessment was based was far to small for any cases of serious adverse reactions to show up. The rates of occurrence of serious AEs was therefore assumed to be similar to those for older age groups. There appears to be no evidence presented upon which this assumption is based.
It is also pretty clear that the question of whether there is actually an emergency in this age group that would be mitigated by a vaccination programme has not been addressed.
In my book, these facts alone would be enough to invalidate the entire exercise. HART simply add more fuel to the fire.
It remains to be seen whether our own MHRA / JCVI will follow the example of the FDA, but I suspect we may not have to wait very long to find out.
Indeed, some of the great and the good seem to be intent to get their retribution in first.
HART also reviews the (minimal) response of the authorities in many countries to the unknown risks to conception, pregnancy and child-birth posed by the vaccines, despite many reports of menstrual problems in women who have been vaccinated.
"Recruitment is now underway in Israel for a clinical trial (NCT04748172) examining the effect of COVID -19 mRNA injections on ovarian reserve. Injecting millions of women of child-bearing age with mRNA injections before understanding the impact they may have on fertility is nothing short of reckless. Regardless of the outcome, the very fact that this crucial study is only now being undertaken is pure negligence. If they do indeed find that fertility is affected, what then? There is no rewind button"
"... who is ultimately responsible for the harms that may be caused as a result? It certainly will not be the vaccine manufacturers, who were granted legal indemnity"
Quite so. However, if the charge is genocide based on fraud, then it remains to be seen whether that particular "legal indemnity" will stand up in court.
