2022-02-22
I've seen various reports on this and it's past time to pull one of them out of the hat.
Did Big Pharma not bother to get the Big Insurers on-side? Or were they cynical enough to realise that they didn't need to, since claims of this type against insurers were bound to fail?
I wonder if anyone with health insurance in the UK is similarly not covered?
"The hitch is that on all levels, including legal, the shots are experimental. The insurance company stated the policy clearly states that deaths from experimental medicine are the same as suicide, and it doesn’t need to pay out"
Now we in the UK have our NHS but they don't pay out on your death, and may not recognise your illness as being vaccine-related (since such problems are always described as incredibly "rare"). Thus if you are vaccine-injured there may be no appropriate treatment available, even though the various side-effects have long been listed and if you are giving multiple shots to the whole population you might reasonably expect that numerically numerous such cases are bound to arise.
I have to say that if I were an insurance company I wouldn't insure against experimental treatments either. They are a business, not a rescue service for the habitually unquestioning.
However, I do think that a legal claim could be made against (a) the medical clinician in charge of the injection/s (b) the NHS (c) the regulatory authorities and probably (d) the Secretary of State for Health, the Chief Medical Officer, SAGE advisers, and even the Prime Minister for recklessly pushing an unauthorised experimental vaccine on almost the entire population whilst touting the vaccines as safe and effective (this is not legal advice - consult a solicitor for that).
