Free Citizen

2025-11-26

The administrative government, seemingly oblivious to the constitutional need for our citizens to be judged by a "jury of our peers", now proposes, in order to cut the administrative backlog now denying justice to criminals and victims alike, to abolish the right to a jury for "non-serious" offences.

Magna Carta? What's that? How old-fashioned! We need to be modern, and grasp the benefits that modernity offers! Who would not want justice delivered promptly and without fear? Ancient and outdated tradition must not be permitted to stand in the way of progress!

This is how the ignorant and the mendacious want to convince us to abandon what remains of our Constitution so that they may better rule the people by decree. No matter that it is the people themselves who were sovereign, have always been sovereign, still are sovereign, and will always be sovereign unless and until they give up their sovereignty for the

2025-11-25

This is dangerous territory, so before plunging in, if you have not already, please read Down the Rabbit Hole 1 wherein I attempt to justify taking a critical look at topics which many will find controversial.

Here someone else takes a look at early Christianity (upon which topic the brainwashing has had at least two millennia to get going). He's obviously done a lot more work on this than I have, so I'm very happy to concede the leadership on this one.

But first, to get ourselves into the mood...

Do we believe that the Bible as we know it today is the uncorrupted Word of God?

Do we think we know the origins of the Church of England?

Or the foundation of Christianity in Rome after the

2025-11-25

The command economy doesn't seem to be faring too well...

(11 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

As if that isn't bad enough, there seems to be an Epstein connection...

2025-11-25

Yes, Martin Geddes has been up to his illuminations of matters legal and lawful, in terms that I would wager most of us could comprehend.

If we were asked to attend court and found ourselves "had up" before the head teacher in the local secondary school, we might begin to question the genuineness not only of the proceedings but also of those conducting the proceedings.

"When is a 'Court' not a Court?" would be a relevant question, and the Head Teacher should have some explaining to do.

Still, if instead we had attended in a building labelled as a "Court" and been confronted by somebody professing to be a magistrate, would anybody dare to question the legitimacy of the situation? Yet the overwhelming likelihood of just accepting the given as legitimate surely is an open invitation for fraudsters to take advantage? Even unwitting fraudsters who themselves had not validated their higher authority?

2025-11-24

I seems that the White Hats are circling their prey, and the Black hats are circling their wagons to try to stave off the inevitable.

Israel and Ukraine are key - one is apparently intent on genociding Gaza, and the other is intent on genocide in the Ukraine at the hands of the Russians. Meanwhile the Zelensky leadership seems close to being fingered in an alleged corruption scandal involving the disposition of the "support" that has been flowing into the country from the EU and elsewhere.

There is more of course, but it's behind the paywall for this week.

(Modest subscription required for full access)

2025-11-24

And deservedly so.

No, it was not an "in depth" inquiry, which would have asked the deep questions such as "Why were Prof Ferguson's Covid expected deaths modelling so vastly inflated"? 

Was the supposition that the PCR tests worked infallibly true - to what extent was it not true? All tests produce "false positives" and "false negatives" - was this novel test for a novel virus actually accurate - or was the testing of the (largely asymptomatic) general population actually a good exercise to determine the real rate of "false positives"?

If a mere IT retiree such as myself could think to ask such simple but revealing questions, what does that say about the good Baroness

2025-11-23

Barbara Boyd spells out some of the implications of our pre-Christmas situations, especially (comme d'habitude) with respect to the much-vaunted (but never defined!) "Special Relationship" between the UK and America - a relationship that Trump (against all presidential precedents?) appears to be on track to now dominate.

(14 minutes)

2025-11-23

Interest of Justice found out in Costa Rica.

They have the win, they now have to sue enough national governments to start a global ball of Nuremberg trials rolling...

... and that costs dosh.

It sounds a lot, but there's a lot of us, so per capita it won't break the bank.

That's the theory anyway, and so far it's been proven correct.

It's doable, and it's down to us.

And they have the win to prove it.

2025-11-23

Peace in the Ukraine?

Sebastian pulls the strings together to sort out the situation - which is (and has been for some time now) that Russia will settle only on terms which respect its oft-stated red lines.

Since the EU-UK is adamantly opposed to this but doesn't have the military capacity to stop the Russian army, they will need to cover any agreement in so much verbiage that they can convince themselves that they have won...

Will it work?

(15 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-11-22

The UN's Climate Control Event COP30 did not go according to plan.

After all, nothing destroys an illusion like reality, and the reality is that none of the much-foretold climate-warming catastrophes deigned to come true, even as the worst effects of the push for Agenda 2030 become glaringly apparent.

So was it all for nothing?

I don't think so.

It has had / will have the singular effect of destroying the trust that uncritical people have reflexively placed in the UN's authority.

Watch what happens now to the WHO, the WHO-WEF partnership, the UN aid programmes and much else besides.

As a fish rots from the head,

2025-11-22

Whilst the official reports from these enquiries say whatever the Governments want their appointees  to say, independent journalist Biologyphenom attended the sessions and wrote his/her own accounts of the ongoings.

These should have come with a warning - there is so much material here that once you start to read it you may never stop...

Still, if you have a particular interest then this independent chronicler may well have covered it. I salute her/his courage tenacity and endurance.

Health and Truth reports.

The Daily Sceptic offers a more structured analysis of the UK Covid

2025-11-22

Monsanto is infamous for the herbicide Glyphosate, which is widely used for the wheat harvest.

Monsanto eventually sold the rights to Glyphosate to Bayer, who was also subsequently sued.

"Dogs have the highest rate of cancer rate of any mammals... "

Glyphosate was withdrawn from retail sale in the UK a while ago, but is still available for commercial sale to farmers, who use it (but not exclusively) on grain crops (wheat, oats, barley etc).

"Wisner outlines Monsanto’s malice and blatant disregard for human safety as demonstrated in their own documents and even in their statements and behavior during the trial"

Bread cake pasta and pastry lovers take note!

It's also almost impossible these

2025-11-22

The State of Trumpmerica, according to Patrick Henningson of 21st Century Wire.

If Russia is resolute, America is dissolute and MAGA is in need of a transfusion.

"... the United States is no longer agreement-capable... "

(30 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-11-21

In olden times every Court had its jester, the only man who could get away with speaking truth unto power.

Nowadays, in the absence of formal Court Jesters, that role falls squarely on the shoulders of the modern day Cartoonists, jesters to the Nation at large.

Bob Moran has taken up that challenge with gusto, neatly skewering many aspects of the Covid Experience with consummate accuracy.

Yet perhaps his most striking contribution is only now come upon us, and unusually, it is couched not in cartoon form but in succinct prose that should strike terror into the hearts of those who know, or who now realise, that they are amongst the voluminous ranks of the guilty.

Its subject: the

2025-11-20

Alex Krainer reviews the prospects for WW3.

"The system in the world is being changed... "

(57 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-11-20

Cannabis is a topic about which I know next to nothing, so I won't babble on about it.

I would however remark that legislation is usually the antithesis of freedom, proposed by all those who dislike the behaviours of others whilst imagining that their own behaviours are obviously fine.

"Health and safety" has been much overused by government to bring in unnecessary restrictions that might have been better addressed by the (currently their own!) education system. Still, Parliament's job is to legislate, so that's it's default solution. It has reached well beyond the point where nobody can be realistically expected to understand the full extent of the law, whilst "ignorance of the law is no excuse". Legal beagles thus make their fortunes, and the citizen who regards the law in general as unnecessarily restrictive isn't always going to respect it

A Glimpse of Parliamentary Crises Ahead?

2025-11-18

Brownstone Institute (Maryanne Demasi) reports on that other strategy alleged by some to wreak havoc with out health:- statins.

Everybody these days (at least above a certain age) it seems is "advised" to take statins as a preventative "because cholesterol" (and maybe because it's more dosh into the pockets of Big Pharma).

This is controversial, as cholesterol is a somewhat oversimplified term with various versions and shades of effects. It's natural, and we would die without it.

My own rule now is that my body simply cannot be unwell due to a lack of pharmaceutical products, which have only been invented in the blink of the last 100 years or so.

We know such products are not

2025-11-17

The British State has a long and some would say illustrious history.

It boasted a huge empire, with not always beneficial results, and although the results of Empire are inevitably mixed, they don't usually fall to the Emperor's disadvantage.

Until the Emperor gets greedy and provokes an inevitable backlash.

Yet now the conflict has changed - it isn't just between the colonies and the colonizing power, it's between the 1% elite who would own everything, including the 99%, and the 99% who prefer freedom to slavery, technocratic or otherwise. The odds just changed.

(16 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-11-17

Trump behaving erratically is nothing new - Trump doing the right thing with any consistency would seem in today's world to be rather 'last year'.

But the new world has moved on from the old one in which the CIA-MI6-Mossad led Five Eyes could do more or less as they pleased - as the BBC, even Zelenski, are discovering.

Yes it's true that Trump is causing consternation in all quarters seemingly without fear of favour, and the world is becoming less subservient to the secret "services" and more attuned to their own interests, for whatever reason - perhaps unpredictability is necessarily infectious.

So the world has moved along another couple of notches toward catastrophe, and it's business as usual.

(Modest subscription required for full