Health

2023-04-18

Given the current debate about the effects of mRNA technological therapies, and the proposals being put forward at the (reportedly funded largely by pharmaceutical interests) WHO, it is obvious to all that healthcare might be coming a long way behind financial considerations in the motivations of the movers and shakers of the UK medical establishment.

If you ask me (well you didn't, but I'll offer my thoughts anyway), the obvious and enormous alleged conflicts of interest are sufficient cause in their own right to haul the said movers and shakers before the courts and have them testify as to their conflicts of interest - a properly constituted Royal Commission should do the job. Conflicts of interest on such a scale should disqualify them all.

Of course, the chances of that happening are zero, given the track record of Parliament and the current Monarch in putting the interests of the population ahead of any corporate interests, and the disposition of ordinary folk to

2023-04-18

Th WHO is never one to pass up an opportunity to increase its powers, and if necessary is perfectly prepared to debate and assign to itself additional powers that purport to extend its constitutional powers without reference to any democratic mandate.

"... this constitution will be fundamentally changed by the two instruments that are in the pipeline  following the Covid-19 pandemic..."

" The WHO is domiciled in Geneva... it's employees are exempt from tax and they and their families all have diplomatic immunity... "

"... it is indeed a supranational body, unelected and unaccountable"

"The original ideals of the WHO and WHA were completely laudable... "

"Who is now funding the WHO? Like many of our regulators in the UK: The MHRA (86% funded by industry sources), the JCVI member's personal declarations declared more than

2023-04-16

I don't doubt that many are heartily sick of hearing about the WHO and it's predilection for promoting its pestilential pandemic panics, but hey, what else are they supposed to do?

The Pandemic Treaty (or "Accord" as we are now supposed to call it) "will not affect individual countries’ sovereignty" according to that panjandrum of interference in global health affairs, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

A bit like the UK joining the EU would not compromise our sovereignty, because it was a democratic decision of Parliament and could be revoked by Parliament. So that's all right then.

And maybe it hints at the correct solution to the WHO imperium.

Be that as it may, it isn't the end of the story because the "Accord" is not the only threat on the books - we also need to consider (but Parliament may or may not debate?) the WHO's proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, which apparently

2023-04-15

Ivor Cummins made waves with his clinical analyses of the statistics surrounding the Covid pandemic, and although he's not medically qualified, he brought the whole pandemic down to the fundamentals of what was going on.

He is now teaming up with Gabor Erdosi to bring you a new source of health information - the "Metabolic Duo".

Here he is introducing the notion. I have no doubt that it will be a resounding success .

(11 minutes) 

Like / Dislike this video here.

2023-04-15

(8 minutes)

2023-04-15

As absurdity piles upon absurdity, Sir Julian Rose talks with Richard Vobes to explain the true state of affairs as they are imposed by our affairs of State - particularly with respect to our food supplies.

"We the consumers have to take this initiative - we are the only people that can save these sorts of farmers"

" ... we want real food, we want it fresh, and we want it local, and we'll pay a fair price for it... "

"... we could start, finally, to break down this gap between the urban / suburban and the farming community..."

Supermarket food looks nice, but it's farm-to-consumer miles are off the scale and

 "... it's all highly destructive on every environmental level possible"

Quite so.

Allowing the supermarket supplies to

2023-04-09

Daily Express breaks the taboo with an article by Professor Angus Dalgleish on the aftermath of the Covid jabs.

"Why are they still being offered when the yellow card system as the MHRA has far more yellow card adverse reactions reports than all the other vaccines ever made available over the last 50 years in the UK?"

Many of us have been asking this for a long time, but better late then never.

"This alone should have led to the total cessation of the vaccine programme, as was the case in the 1976 swine and flu outbreak in America"

"I believe that we reached this point with the Covid vaccine 18 months ago"

"We have been brought up on a diet of ‘follow the science’ through this pandemic but there now appears to have been no science performed whatsoever, at any stage - it is pure political hegemony"

...

2023-04-07

Set aside your preconceptions, and enjoy this discussion on the vaccine industry, from the point of view of - the vaccine industry.

The Pulse has done us a favour here, since most of the contributions on this debate have been, shall we say, somewhat polarised.

Whichever side of the debate (or echo-chamber!) you may be on, "know thine enemy" is good advice.

The UKHSA gets specific mention...

(39 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2023-04-06

A conference of health professionals, journalists, truth seekers and activists of all descriptions.

Better Way Conference is an initiative of World Council for Health& EbMCsquared.

View the 58 minutes of the 2022 conference, reviewing the status of the medical establishments worldwide at that time.

"The WHO has a historical legacy of mismanagement and corruption that is rooted in conflicts of interest"

"... WHO is all about human rights and sovereignty... they're not... what we are saying is that what you are doing is wrong... you have had your time ... and we're going to pressurise our World Health Assembly delegates to withdraw... We don't want our funding going into any organisation... that essentially is going to

2023-04-06

President Putin has made no secret of his opposition to the use of DU munitions in the challenger tanks that "our" government has promised to the Ukraine - but he would say that wouldn't he?

The surprising bit of news is that DU has been reportedly detected in the UK since February 2022 when the war began.

We know from previous experience that radioactive emissions from the Chernobyl nuclear accident were instrumental in persuading the Soviet Union to confess that it was one of their reactors that failed, but news that DU traces have been detected in the UK already is a surprise - if they can't have time-travelled back from the future, it's reasonable to suppose that one or both of the opposing forces in the Ukraine have been using such ammunition. 

Of course supposition is not proof, and there may be some other explanation, but DU is not exactly in widespread use as far as I know.

2023-04-01

House testimony in the state of Missouri is yielding admissions that may not make it into mainstream media.

"Redfield has admitted that, not only was SARS-COV-2 created in a lab using gain of Function research but also that this research is going on and WILL be the cause of the next great pandemic"

"The biotech lobbyists admitted that GMO food like the type Bill Gates wants to manufacture in factories WILL actually alter your genetic code!"

"Naturally, big Pharma and their associates oppose disclosure and informed consent"

"They actually opposed the bill on the basis that this law would require them to admit that all of their GMO products ARE in fact impacting people’s genetic code"

"If a GMO food is being designed with the intent to modify or knowledge that it will facilitate a

2023-03-31

"I've started so I'll continue" MP Andrew Bridgen continues to cause indigestion in the Commons:

(2 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

"... outrageous conspiracy theories... "

Quite so, impossible to disagree.

Unhappily, as history attests, being outrageous has never been any bar to being true.

2023-03-31

Ed Dowd, formerly of Black Rock, and his associates have investigated the likely damage in the USA from the Covid vaccines roll-out.

Don't panic, it's the USA not the UK, but bearing in mind that the UK has approximately 20% of the population of the US, as a first very rough approximation the UK may have suffered in the region of  20% of these figures, even if no UK officials want to depart from the now facile but uninformative "safe and effective" narrative.

There is still work to do, and perhaps Andrew Bridgen MP has started it.

Zero Hedge reports.

2023-03-30

In a very parliamentary performance before a packed almost empty chamber, Sir Christopher addresses perhaps the most significant, most divisive and potentially devastating (for politicians) and sadly only too devastating (for the victims) topic that parliament as a whole clearly prefers not to face - almost matching the level of non-attendance that Andrew Bridgen inspired when he recently drew attention to statistics indicating the true nature of the "protection" afforded by the latest booster jabs. 

Sir Christopher was highlighting the need to overhaul and make functional the compensation scheme for the vaccine-damaged. 

That most of these victims have suffered from the Covid jabs is unsurprising given (a) the high numbers of the jabbed (b) the numbers who have received multiple jabs and (c) the novel nature of the

2023-03-29

The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023 is now law in the UK.

Following a public consultation from 7 January to 17 March 2021 (Covid notwithstanding), the government has published its response, plus a summary of the responses received (download).

"Defra’s view is that organisms produced by GE or by other genetic technologies should not be regulated as GMOs if they could have been produced by traditional breeding methods"

But who is to answer this significant "if"

2023-03-26

One hears many rumblings in the media about bird flu and poultry shortages, but of course there's never a problem that government intervention cannot make immeasurably worse "for our safety".

Even if government did nothing, poultry farms would individually try differing approaches and those that hit upon the right methodology would subsequently prosper, whilst the remainder would be asking them "what did you do right?". Before long everyone would be doing right.

Government stepping in simply ensures that everyone does it wrong, and cannot subsequently learn from those that did it right.

(So it is with all top-down centralised control, whether we are talking chickens, beef, motorised transport, film making, pandemics, news media, religion, or monetary madness. The host of individuals operating collectively by their own individual free association, free speech, and free will and judgement is inherently superior to central diktat, since it enables all sorts

2023-03-25

Yes, "our" government has of course given the pharmaceutical companies indemnity from prosecution (how is that in our interests? I only ask because I would like to know) but that doesn't necessarily preclude those injured from suing for additional losses over and above the standard one-size-fits-all government-stipulated limit of £120K.

The Daily Sceptic reminds us of this point, and notes that victims of the Astrazeneca jab are indeed mounting legal action against the pharmaceutical company for damages above that limit.

"Lawyers representing the group, who are pursuing personal injury compensation in addition to a Vaccine Damage Payments Scheme claim, argue that the AstraZeneca vaccine was 'not as safe as the public were entitled to expect' and that the case is not about finding fault 'but about the reasonable expectation of safety'. They claim people were provided with a false picture of safety and efficacy and expect the number joining the lawsuit to increase."

...

2023-03-23

This Guardian article from June 2021 may or may not have relevance to the behaviour of our MPs in Parliament at Andrew Bridgen's recent Friday 17th debate on the safety and efficacy of the Covid booster shots.

“In the context of health-related APPGs, payments from the pharmaceutical industry represent institutional conflicts of interest as they create circumstances where the primary interest, policymaking in the interests of public health, is at risk of being unduly influenced by the secondary interest, the pharmaceutical industry’s goal of maximising profits”

Either way, it does highlight the potential for conflicts of interest which some suspect pervade every nook and cranny of "our" governmental and medical regulatory and health delivery complex.

2023-03-19

Problem:

Andrew Bridgen MP addresses an empty House:

(24 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Reaction - Solution: 

Richard Vobes ruminates on the latest situation:

(21 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2023-03-15

Trans man Scott Nugent explodes the myths and the truths behind the transgender movement, particularly the campaigns to persuade kids that changing their gender is a good idea.

Everybody should watch this twitter video, but be warned - it isn't for the faint of heart.

But it is unmissable.