Legal Legal Repeal

2024-03-03

We recently reported on the court case being progressed in Costa Rica.

The case has still to come to trial, but meanwhile Interest of Justice reports that they have filed for an injunction to stop the Covid "vaccines" on the grounds that they were never properly authorised, but were always experimental.

Today's update provides more detail.

2024-03-02

Humanity is at the cross-roads - and on board a bus being driven as hard and fast as possible into a future that nobody has tested for safety - despite "our safety" being the go-to excuse of our elites to lock us down, jab us with who-knows what, feed us with who-knows what, confine us to quarters, and generally ride roughshod over all our traditional time-honoured freedoms.

Have we noticed yet?

Or are we still too busy playing ever more responsive silly games on our phones?

Do we the people have to separately investigate, conduct our own safety trials, determine any effects detrimental to the environment, document and prove the harm that any and each of these novel technological marvels may do to us and/or the environment, to the satisfaction of a legal system that takes forever, charges exorbitant fees, and may not even be fair and even-handed?

If so, then what are our

2024-02-29

Peace by International Treaty...

Michael O'Bernicia explains his new legal jurisdiction to Richard Vobes.

Prepare to be amazed - is Universal Community Trustthe answer for life, the universe, and the end for fraudulent government?

Don't fight it, obsolete it!

(57 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Also see the Great British Mortgage Swindle

...

2024-02-27

There have been minor legal triumphs following the Covid injections, but no knock-out case so far.

But the court cases keep coming, slowed by technicalities and procedural devices, but still they come.

This one has been stalled for a while but is being reconfigured to come back to court in Costa Rica.

It is centred on the pivotal point that these injections were never fully approved medical products, and were therefore in substance experimental, a status which demands much more careful handling both medical and legal.

Interest of Justice reports.

2024-02-27

This alleged "name fraud" probably isn't limited in scope to the DVLA, it may be endemic to legal systems of the Crown in general, but we are discussing matters motoring here, so I'm not going to quibble.

Who am I? Who are you?

These are pretty basic questions in normal life, but rather more complex in legal definition. Indeed, some suggest that this question lies at the heart of much legal chicanery, as the man-on-the-Clapham-omnibus understandably fails to note the subtle legal distinctions at play in his legal identity.

It's time to learn them - you may not legally be who you think you are!

2024-02-27

One needs to be very self-confident to represent oneself in Court, and navigate through the (usually unstated) legal presumptions and unfamiliar legal language that some might think masquerades as the King's English.

One needs to be supremely self-confident to demand that the judge presiding your case recuse himself on the grounds of allegedly not applying the law with proper integrity.

These matters are of vital interest to all of us - if the justice system is subverted, then we are all liable to be its victims at some point or other.

Thus we note Martin's latest report on his ongoing brush with "TV Licensing" with interest.

2024-02-27

"... these are serious breaches of the right of self-determination, the prohibitions of racial discrimination and apartheid, and the right of return... "

(26 minutes) 

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-02-26

It's a question that I can't answer, and how matters unfold may become "interesting".

If councils are actually corporations as many aver, then when bankrupt, should they not be wound up like any other corporation?

But apparently there is doubt about this. It seems that they may become zombies, dedicated to charging their luckless residents ever higher council tax for ever decreasing services (and implementingother money-making wheezes) in a possibly futile effort to pay their debts and balance their books at some indeterminate time, possibly far into the future... 

2024-02-24

President of El Salvador Nayib Bukele addresses CPAC after his recent re-election victory.

"The next person into the United States must not only win an election, he must have the vision, the will and the courage to do whatever it takes"

"... we have to remove corrupt judges and corrupt attorneys and prosecutors"

(24 minutes)

Like/Dislike this video here.

2024-02-22

A good question, upon which much legal deliberation has already been lavished.

An equally good question might be "and who should decide?".

In the UK this question used to be decided locally, but in recent times the government decided that they will decide on fluoridation centrally.

I don't remember the people clamouring for this change, so they made it entirely on the basis that the government knows best, and we locals cannot be trusted to look after ourselves.

This almost certainly means that whereas very few local water supplies are fluoridated to date, this number will be greatly expanded until all supplies are fluoridated. In government, one-size-fits-all rules.

Are we concerned that the

2024-02-21

"Safe and effective" is a phrase that has been much bandied about (some consider recklessly) in recent years. Words matter, and need to be chosen carefully in order to clearly communicate the intended meaning.

Some may argue that "safe and effective" was indeed a careful choice to communicate the desired meaning whilst maybe leaving some leeway for interpretation.

This idea that words matter... well, it matters.

If the words are not right, then the right information is not imparted, and this could be important, for example - oh, I don't know - perhaps on a planning application.

Richard Vobes investigates... prepare for surprises.

(71 minutes)

...

2024-02-20

It seems reasonable to assume from their name that the Good Law Project is all about good law.

It isn't therefore necessarily about good climate science, but the Government in its all-knowing wisdom has enshrined its binding net zero targets in law, I suppose because that's the only thing they know how to do.

Of course, that doesn't mean to say that the targets will actually be met, but there's a good chance that it won't be this government that's in place when the targets fall due and the lawsuits begin to fly.

Anyway, the Good Law project, mindful no doubt of the sometimes lengthy nature of legal proceedings, has shrewdly got its retribution in first and compelled the government to disclose its assessments of the risks that may bedevil these now legally binding

2024-02-20

"The New Zealand Court of Appeal has ruled against the NZDF's Covid-19 vaccination mandate, citing breaches of rights"

"New Zealand... has made a decent ruling where they decided the government did not use the least burdensome method by imposing vaccine mandates. The court was only asked to stop the mandates and it complied"

Read all about it.

2024-02-20

Journalist Taylor Hudak(Telegram link)reports today for the Interests of Justice.

As in all such major trials, there are two agencies on trial - the defendant Julian Assange, and the British Justice system.

The primary law involved is our extradition treaty with the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - if you ask me, that fails immediately if the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA should be found to be bankrupt... but what do I know? And even if it is, would/could that be acknowledged as fact in Court, bearing in mind that legal facts are those agreed upon by the parties concerned in the case.

Read her report

2024-02-20

This topic arouses much one-sided opinion, whichever party (or none) to this long-standing conflict one may support.

On the one hand we have Hamas who inflicted a military incursion on Israel back in early October last, resulting in some deaths and taking a limited number of hostages.

On the other hand we have Israel who in self defence has seemingly set about an unrestricted war on the whole Gaza strip, apparently conflating "Hamas" with the entire Palestinian population so that the latter becomes the target for elimination. 

Yes, it's vastly more complex than these over-simplified statements, but space here prohibits an in-depth analysis even were I capable to provide such a thing.

But events move on, and the International Court of Justice in the Hague, following their original hearing of South Africa's assertion that Israel is conducting a genocide in Gaza, subsequently issued a demand that Israel should

2024-02-19

With the world psychosis ratcheting incrementally every week, the latest example of over-reach comes from the home of Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité - yes, the government of La Belle France has legislated for... well, watch for yourself.

(11 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-02-14

It is a basic tenet of our legal system that justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done.

This "being seen to be done" cannot merely be interpreted as "being seen by the legal profession to be done" since the whole point of the principle is that the public should not lose confidence in the independence of the judiciary.

Whose responsibility is it to ensure that justice is seen to be done, and what safeguards are in place to ensure that when it isn't, something appropriate is done about it?

I am no lawyer, so will not comment on the correct legal interpretation of the case in question, but to my untutored mind it does appear that in this case, justice might not have been seen to be done. The very fact that a noted independent journalist thinks so is to my mind prima facie evidence for this.

2024-02-13

With the European (plus British and Irish) farmers on the march against government overreach, now is perhaps a good time to review the kind of steps that can be taken legally to discourage heavy-handed government measures based upon pretexts that may not actually stand up to scrutiny in depth.

For example, take Bovine Tuberculosis, the cause of which is/was said to be the "reservoir" of the disease in wild badgers, which prompted the extensive culling of badgers in recent years. 

Being not a farmer myself, I haven't heard of any particular widespread situation related to Bovine TB, and as far as I know the WEF has not yet mandated the destruction of our cattle for any reason other than excessive flatulence.

But in case I am behind the curve here, I draw attention to the Bernician's

2024-02-13

No, don't worry, nothing to do with the Fujitsu system and the Royal Mail's conflict with their local postmasters, this is your introduction to the now-space.

So listen up as the Richard:Vobes interviews Russell-Jay:Gould, proponent of the quantum-grammar.

"... the Post Offices of the world control the country's military... "

"... the United Nations is a fraudulent organisation that has zero authority to do anything - because they can't read and write... "

"... you're using a lot of terms that are completely new to me... "  (and so say all of us!)

(57 minutes)

Good Luck!

The Unfolding UK Police State