Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser
- Details
- Written by: Super User
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 88
2024-02-16
A very hard-hitting, hard to watch report from UK Column covering chapter and verse of the Covid "pandemic" vaccines trials, and subsequent approvals under Emergency Use Authorisation by the MHRA.
"The FoIA request was eventually granted by court order through the PHMPT's attorney, Aaron Siri. The judge in the matter required the FDA to release all 451,000 pages of information over eight months, despite the FDA planning to retain the data for 75 years"
Yes, there's a lot of detail here but in summary form (phew!), all based on documented results from many thousands of volunteers for the original Pfizer and Moderna vaccine trials.
It's a long presentation at a little over one hour, but keep going because the final summary of how the "outbreak" went all the way from "we've got a problem (a handful of cases in China of something unidentified that looks nasty)" to "we've got pandemic of a new virus for which we now have a confirmed official test ready to distribute to the whole world" all within the space of one month.
It's your view that counts.
- Details
- Written by: Super User
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 88
2024-02-15
Personally I'm pretty fed up with the unstoppable folk at the WHO (and the UN and their multiple associated agencies and corporate associates with massive vested interests). It's high time they met with the irresistible force of mass non-compliance.
Their incessant obsession about pandemics and their supposed expertise giving them sole untrammelled authority to
(a) identify and declare a pandemic and
(b) dictate the interventions that we must all submit to in order to survive it
are become frankly boring. The are boring precisely because the WHO etc are impervious to rational argument, and push on with the same old same old regardless of all logical persuasion.
Their claim to be worthy of such powers can be refuted by simple logic in a few lines:
- They are (we must assume and assert) human, and humans are infamous for their propensity to make errors, as well as for their potential to be corrupted. Any one human or human-based body corporate cannot be relied upon - especially those with potential conflicts of interest. Yes, a large portion of WHO funding comes from Big Pharma and their associates.
- If by any unlikely chance a pandemic should actually strike, and the WHO should take a wrong turn and fail to prescribe the correct responses (remember - they are allegedly human) then by their own logic it will sweep the world and millions / billions may die.
- If on the other hand the medical people in each country (ideally down to each clinic and surgery) would be free to devise and adopt their own solutions, and the WHO would limit itself to monitoring and reporting their results, then the best proven solutions would quickly emerge and would be adopted elsewhere.
But by now we all "know" that saving lives is not the name of the game.
How do we know?
Since we haven't had any genuine pandemic for at least a century (and probably much longer), it is very clear that their focus on pandemics isn't motivated by any genuine evidence for one incoming any time soon (other than unsupported assertions from such as Bill Gates).
And for those that say "Ah, but what about Covid-19?" I say "a genuine pandemic would cause excess deaths aplenty - at least enough to show up in the statistics (if not then is it worth worrying about?).
A significant level of excess deaths (from all causes) did not show up in the statistics until after the vaccine roll-out - and prompted interest from neither governments nor the WHO (so are they actually concerned for our welfare?).
For those pedants who still cry "but the tests showed that Covid was everywhere" and "Covid deaths were very visible in the statistics" I say "the WHO itself noted that the PCR test was susceptible to false positives (especially in "low incidence" populations - such as the asymptomatic, who were being tested left right and centre) and 'Covid' was listed as cause of death merely on the basis of a positive PCR test, regardless of other factors. I could add that the PCR test was never actually proven to identify the Covid virus, and that at the height of the Covid scare, flu deaths had virtually disappeared ... make of that what you will.
Quod erat demonstrandum.
Still, for those that want to know more (and risk terminally entangling themselves in the weeds of all the history of "pandemic preparedness", etc etc), dive in here.
- Details
- Written by: Super User
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 116
2024-01-26
Shocking testimony of Covid19 nurses - in the NHS and in the USA.
- Details
- Written by: Super User
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 99
2024-01-18
ICAN release their latest legal update, with more data collected by the CDC (but not previously released) concerning adverse reactions to the Covid "vaccines". A lot of detailed information, including lot numbers, and links to previously released data for Pfizer and Moderna.
"ICAN recently broke the news that its legal team had wrangled detailed lot and dose data for the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines from CDC. Now, ICAN is happy to announce that we have likewise also obtained the critical lot and dose data for the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) vaccine"
Dig in ...
- Details
- Written by: Super User
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 115
2023-11-29
Probably not in all respects, but when it comes to its statutory obligations to ensure the safety of medicinal products it is hard to come to any other conclusion but that they were indeed asleep at the wheel.
Nick Hunt writing for the Daily Sceptic reports on the indifference with which it appears to have approached its responsibilities in respect of the Covid protective inoculations.
It would be unkind to suppose that it has been asleep in all respects though - it was quick enough to expedite approval for these shots, but of course it would be disingenuous to suggest that this had anything to do with their funding received from the pharmaceutical industry when it was obviously motivated by the need to protect the public from the "pandemic".
Can anybody enlighten me as to when exactly the notion of "conflict of interest" fell by the wayside? Some might think it well overdue for a renaissance.
See also this one hour assembly of video clips from the Highwire on their investigation of vaccines in general.