EU e-Privacy Directive

This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.


In the public understanding, the BioNTech vaccine is the one for which Pfizer has an Emergency Use Authorisation. 

In the legal understanding, is that actually the case? It appear that it may not be.

In the real world is it physically the case? This may not be clear-cut either!

Technocracy News digs up the drains beneath this FDA "approval" and explains their understanding of what is going on here, and why.

I have to say it's one of the most complete analyses that I have seen. It's necessarily fairly complex but that comes with the territory.

Although the FDA decision has generate much confusion, it may not have generated enough, and many may be unaware that the legal implications are not the same and legally the current Pfizer product with the EUA does not carry the same legal terms and conditions as the BioNTech Comirnaty product (which is not yet available).

Besides all that, the trials which underpin these products are incomplete and in many respects inadequate to demonstrate safety in the areas of usage now anticipated:

"the idea that the FDA is even considering approving the shot for children as young as 12 — and are running trials on babies — is completely incomprehensible"

Given that various bodies are keen to mandate "the vaccine" for employees and schoolchildren, this is highly recommended reading.


Technocracy News publishes a report that seems to have eluded the mainstream western press.

The Indian Bar Association has taken the bull by the horns, suing the WHO Chief Scientist Dr Soumya Swaminathan "accusing her ... of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin".

This is the first legal action that I am aware of that takes any authority to task for suppression of prophylactic treatments for Covid-19. 

Perhaps it will be the first of many.

Read the full report.

Note also the subsequent legal notice (download) of 13 June 2021 "for Contempt served upon to Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Dr. Sunil Kumar"

"Contempt of Court and aggravated offences against humanity by spreading disinformation about the drug ‘Ivermectin’, despite having full knowledge of the Judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa dated May 28, 2021"

Other actions reported on the IBA legal blog also make very interesting reading, including but not limited to the following:

  • 3 July 2021 Formal Complaint from the Secretary General of the Human Rights Security Council "for ... conspiracy and serious offences committed against humanity in COVID-19 pandemic"

    It doesn't come much stronger than this extremely wide-ranging complaint. 

    It pulls no punches! (download)


The Daily Sceptic reports today on a legal development in Portugal.

Judge Files Complaint Against Portuguese Government For its ‘Criminal’ Mismanagement of the Covid Crisis

If you can read Portuguese then you can visit the original article for the link to the original PDF file.

If you can't read Portuguese then just for our readers, here is an English translation of that PDF file.

Don't say I don't look after you cool.

This is a comprehensive complaint dealing with a large number of issues of illegality.

Readers may remember that Portugal has form in challenging the global Covid narrative. It will be interesting to see how far this new complaint goes and whether it gains any traction within a sensible timeframe.



This is a question whose answer seems very much to depend upon who is providing the answer.

The AIER has crunched the numbers and come up with some simple scatter charts that illuminate just how much variability exists across the USA.

"The correlations, however weak, are apparent from even a casual inspection of the plots"

"An employer would have to have a workforce of at least 4,543 people to have an average expectation of preventing a single death from Covid-19 by forcing all employees to complete vaccination"

"It is quite likely that significant complications from the vaccine may exceed the average expectation of deaths prevented"

"No Institutional Review Board would approve a clinical study conducted in the same manner as these vaccine programs"

A worthwhile read.


Dr Jane Ruby on the Stew Peters Show identifies "at least 20 crimes in the package insert" for this "FDA approved" vaccine:

"they disclose nothing of what they are legally obligated to do"

"available data ... administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy" and "it's not known if it is excreted in human milk"

RedPil78 claims to have read the whole letter from the FDA to Pfizer, and claims that the "new" approval amounts to nothing more than a long-winded restatement of the existing emergency use approval:


There again, in the fog of war the truth is always the first casualty.

We just need to find out who is telling the porkies, but so far, that's beyond me.

What I would say is that nothing alters the fact that there is no adequate long-term safety record associated with this jab, and it would appear that the FDA on this ground alone would have no business granting a full approval (or even an emergency use approval except perhaps in limited circumstances - but it's done that already). 


USAWatchdog also confirms that the current Pfizer "vaccine" is still only available under the EUA:

"The FDA has granted approval to some future vaccine called “Comirnaty.” ...  (Here’s the letter from the FDA to Pfizer [download]) You cannot get Comirnaty now because it does not exist"

Worth reading in full.