Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser
- Details
- Written by: Super User
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 54
2024-04-11
We all know that our memories fade over time, and most of us are probably only too happy to forget the lockdown idiocies (not to mention turmoil) that swept the nation, and indeed much of the world, in 2020.
Yet if we so blithely discard our recollection of these restrictions, how will we be protected against such extremes in the future? Or could we simply rely upon the official Covid Inquiry to fill the gap?
Surely the events of 2020 should be in effect a vaccination of the population that protects us from ever permitting such nonsense to recur in the future? No It wasn't exactly safe, but if nobody remembers, then it will not be effective either.
An important observation I suspect.
Joanna Gray reminisces for the Daily Sceptic.
- Details
- Written by: Super User
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 55
2024-04-02
We have all been following the UK Covid Enquiry under Baroness Hallett to some extent, to determine how well or otherwise she will dig down to the matters that concern the population.
The good Baroness has a long and distinguished history of being appointed to chairing enquiries into matters of national significance.
Today we have news of a contrasting type of investigation that was conducted in Canada by what one assumes to be a self-organising collective of people throughout Canada, who set up a National Citizens Inquiry to look into the handling of the Covid event in that country.
It will be fascinating to compare the output (when the UK enquiry finally completes ... ) of these two approaches.
Meanwhile, you can read the Final Report of the Canadian people's effort.
Watch the four minute summary on X.
There's a lot to unpack here - including a memo outlining alleged political shenanigans by politicians to secure control over the inquiry in the future ... it seems that the powers that shouldn't be maybe don't like independent thought any more, given that elections may be in the offing that they assume they will win.
Still, the Inquiry to date does seem to have been run on apolitical lines.
(10 minutes)
- Details
- Written by: Super User
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 101
2024-02-16
A very hard-hitting, hard to watch report from UK Column covering chapter and verse of the Covid "pandemic" vaccines trials, and subsequent approvals under Emergency Use Authorisation by the MHRA.
"The FoIA request was eventually granted by court order through the PHMPT's attorney, Aaron Siri. The judge in the matter required the FDA to release all 451,000 pages of information over eight months, despite the FDA planning to retain the data for 75 years"
Yes, there's a lot of detail here but in summary form (phew!), all based on documented results from many thousands of volunteers for the original Pfizer and Moderna vaccine trials.
It's a long presentation at a little over one hour, but keep going because the final summary of how the "outbreak" went all the way from "we've got a problem (a handful of cases in China of something unidentified that looks nasty)" to "we've got pandemic of a new virus for which we now have a confirmed official test ready to distribute to the whole world" all within the space of one month.
It's your view that counts.
- Details
- Written by: Super User
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 107
2024-02-15
Personally I'm pretty fed up with the unstoppable folk at the WHO (and the UN and their multiple associated agencies and corporate associates with massive vested interests). It's high time they met with the irresistible force of mass non-compliance.
Their incessant obsession about pandemics and their supposed expertise giving them sole untrammelled authority to
(a) identify and declare a pandemic and
(b) dictate the interventions that we must all submit to in order to survive it
are become frankly boring. The are boring precisely because the WHO etc are impervious to rational argument, and push on with the same old same old regardless of all logical persuasion.
Their claim to be worthy of such powers can be refuted by simple logic in a few lines:
- They are (we must assume and assert) human, and humans are infamous for their propensity to make errors, as well as for their potential to be corrupted. Any one human or human-based body corporate cannot be relied upon - especially those with potential conflicts of interest. Yes, a large portion of WHO funding comes from Big Pharma and their associates.
- If by any unlikely chance a pandemic should actually strike, and the WHO should take a wrong turn and fail to prescribe the correct responses (remember - they are allegedly human) then by their own logic it will sweep the world and millions / billions may die.
- If on the other hand the medical people in each country (ideally down to each clinic and surgery) would be free to devise and adopt their own solutions, and the WHO would limit itself to monitoring and reporting their results, then the best proven solutions would quickly emerge and would be adopted elsewhere.
But by now we all "know" that saving lives is not the name of the game.
How do we know?
Since we haven't had any genuine pandemic for at least a century (and probably much longer), it is very clear that their focus on pandemics isn't motivated by any genuine evidence for one incoming any time soon (other than unsupported assertions from such as Bill Gates).
And for those that say "Ah, but what about Covid-19?" I say "a genuine pandemic would cause excess deaths aplenty - at least enough to show up in the statistics (if not then is it worth worrying about?).
A significant level of excess deaths (from all causes) did not show up in the statistics until after the vaccine roll-out - and prompted interest from neither governments nor the WHO (so are they actually concerned for our welfare?).
For those pedants who still cry "but the tests showed that Covid was everywhere" and "Covid deaths were very visible in the statistics" I say "the WHO itself noted that the PCR test was susceptible to false positives (especially in "low incidence" populations - such as the asymptomatic, who were being tested left right and centre) and 'Covid' was listed as cause of death merely on the basis of a positive PCR test, regardless of other factors. I could add that the PCR test was never actually proven to identify the Covid virus, and that at the height of the Covid scare, flu deaths had virtually disappeared ... make of that what you will.
Quod erat demonstrandum.
Still, for those that want to know more (and risk terminally entangling themselves in the weeds of all the history of "pandemic preparedness", etc etc), dive in here.