EU e-Privacy Directive

This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.


Is Covid-19 a crime against humanity?

Or are the vaccines a crime against humanity?

Or both of the above?

A crime must cause damage. An attempted crime need not cause damage but must have been attempted in order to cause damage.

It could be argued that Covid-19 itself (whatever it actually is) did not cause damage (being little worse than the infuenza which it seems to have somehow replaced), but was used by certain governments as the reason for the undoubted damage caused by imposition of severe lockdown restrictions.

But the case against the virtual imposition of vaccines through fear of Covid-19 induced by psychological manipulation is much stronger. The vaccines have not been fully authorised, they have only been given approval for use in an emergency, long-term safety is unknown. The trials are ongoing and will not be completed until 2022/2023. Yet the vaccines are being pushed onto the credulous with little apparent attempt to inform them of either the risks or the relatively small claimed benefits.

This is prima facie a major breach of the Nuremberg Code (download).

"Studies on how best to psychologically manipulate citizens to consent to enrolling in an experiment were undertaken by, among others, UCLA’s COVID-19 Health and Politics Project. Marketing, not science was part of the focus"

Jefferey Jaxen has the story.