2025-05-02

What has the old BBC Micro got to do with Martin Geddes' legal work?

It's all down to achieving the correct mindset, one that enables logical thought and analysis regardless of human emotion, location, time or space.

Of course no mindset can last for ever - the inner human gets hungry, the lights eventually go out, and the parking lot beckons, but while it lasts it is all-consuming attention to detail.

But will the results ever see the light of a genuine court?

2025-04-25

Martin Geddes isn't happy to solve the immediate problem, he wants to delve deeper to identify and resolve the underlying cause(s) so that the problem or family of problems will not happen again (or if it does it will fail safely - you can tell he cut his teeth in IT!).

That in principle is simple enough in the context of IT, although IT is now infamous for being constructed of many layers of abstraction, with appropriate software to manage the operation of each layer.

When I started in IT it was possible to understand almost every layer and how it worked... but nowadays nobody understands more than a few - those that are of special significance for the individual. The rest can wait until we are forced to grapple with an unfamiliar error message!

Real-world systems are also multi-layered, even a trip to the shops may involve operating the garage, getting the car out, navigating and driving and operating the car's controls (three or more quite distinct

2025-04-23

Martin Geddes has been waging his one man legal crusade to expose and ultimately invalidate the legal mechanisms that are used to bewilder the unprepared, who are "taken to court" by a due-process-free system (= "taken to the cleaners").

"... no process has authority unless it first proves its standing in truth. This is the difference between tyranny and order..."

"I have asked the AI engine to reverse engineer the implied doctrine I am working with, so that others can see how I am working, and adapt and improve it"

Not to mention using it for themselves.

"This elevates the use of AI above mere productivity... it becomes a high-level thinking partner"

So if you feel like taking on a challenge...

2025-04-22

I've never heard of Perplexity.ai, but it sounds like it might be appropriately named.

Patrick Wood (of Technocracy News) explains what he asked it for and what he got.

" ... they don't want my voice heard anywhere on the internet ... "

Maybe there's something in this AI lark after all...

2025-04-21

First we reported that Martin Geddes has had some success in training his AI to be more responsive to matters spiritual - and now he's not the only one.

This time it's Mark Playne, who has persuaded his AI to come clean about the COVID scamdemic - so pin back your ears and hear what Mark has to say to Richard Vobes on this topic.

Then read his bookon how he did it, it's very revealing!

(49 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-04-19

We touched on this topic recently, but it's probably worth another airing to expand upon some of the practical aspects of "training" your AI in matters doctrinal.

Apparently it can be done, at least up to a point.

"The outputs I am getting from AI are noticeably deeper and more helpful than other people, as I have trained it in foundational doctrine. My AI is now skeptical of official narratives and control structures"

Heck, if Martin can do it, why can't we all?!

Well, perhaps we can.

Especially as we can all access his training materials.

2025-04-17

What does the future hold for man in an AI world?

Will we all be "enhanced" through injected nanobot interfaces to a global AI-powered controller, becoming little more than an obedient node on the Internet of Things?

Or will we leverage our human consciousness to out-think and out-compete AI to the point that we don't need it?

Or could we harness AI to do what it does best - crunching the data and leaving no logical avenue unexplored - whilst we learn how to train it, how to use it to construct the output that we want in a more effective and efficient manner?

Man and AI in perfect symbiosis?

It helps to ask the right question!

Martin Geddes reviews.

2025-04-07

We have featured a number of articles on the topic of AI, notably as used by Martin Geddes to formulate his arguments more comprehensively than he would have been able to do unaided in the same time-frame.

Today we have another contribution to the topic, this time from Cyntha of FallCabal fame, whose approach is from a different perspective. 

Can both be right?

As always, it depends...  

If we recognise the limitations of AI, and use it accordingly for its analysis and presentation skills, then perhaps it can excel, yet if we expect it to exercise human judgement, we may be disappointed. It isn't a living breathing being with hard-fought life experience to match.

We "know"

2025-04-03

Martin Geddes strikes again, this time looking at the aspects of judicial "quality control" within the Family Courts system in the US.

With a twist - AI does the analysis, thus minimising the effect of any pre-existing perceptions on his part.

The result...  well, best read for yourself.

I have little doubt that a similar result would ensue from a UK analysis. Clearly this needs to be urgently progressed.

2025-04-02

UK Column Talks with Catherine Austin Fitts about the onward march towards the digital panopticon, seemingly being supported by the Trump regime in the USA.

There's a lot of topics covered here, and some timely reminders that Trump's installation as President isn't necessarily going to halt stuff in its tracks.

Still, despite the Administration's frantic activity, it's still early days...

(43 minutes)

2025-03-29

Martin Geddes treats us to another of his AI-enabled discourses on the nature of the battle that currently rages around us.

"rages" is probably not the right term for war that is low-key, relying on largely imperceptible propaganda censorship deception cunning and the manipulation of information delivered, rather than physical assault and explosions, but it can be no less devastating in impact on those engaged.

That propaganda censorship deception manipulation and cunning have been the bread and butter of probably all past conflicts is now well understood, so perhaps 5GW is merely the next logical advancement in the Art of War. Tsun Tzu would be proud.

Nevertheless it is a truism that when 5GW falls short, open physical warfare is likely to break out when those who have not achieved their goals

2025-03-13

Elon Musk's DOGE may well have federal agencies on the run (and rightly so), but is there another reason for Elon's time to be invested in this enterprise?

Now as with all tools invented by man, they will be imperfect in various respects and may be used for good or for ill.

Our challenge is always to avoid the worst and to promote the best.

So if Elon is successful in remaking the federal agencies operations to his liking, that isn't necessarily a bad thing overall, but it would be sensible to have the best independent minds reviewing and monitoring to ensure that the worst is avoided and the best is promoted.

The best may well include least cost - provided (big proviso!) that the service provided is an improvement over that provided by human employees.

Given that the

2025-03-11

It is reported that the State of Texas is looking at adding "the equivalent of 30 nuclear reactors by 2030" in order to meet the requirements to connect up new data centres to the grid.

A quick glance at relative population levels reveals that the UK has around twice the population of Texas, so if population size is indicative of power requirement, the UK may need up to 60 new "nuclear reactors" over the next 5 years.

The government seems to agree- at least on the need for data centres...

.. but has anybody thought to tell EdMiliband?

Zero Hedge

2025-02-27

The Glastonbury Symposium is not exactly a mainstream source of topical wisdom - it is however a good venue for challenging one's "little grey cells" to take a hard look at what may be coming right around the next corner.

Andy Thomas, long-time power behind the Symposium, presents another keynote address, providing a critical discussion of the issues of the day (this was July 2024).

Not to mention a possibly terrifying view of the incoming future...

He covers a lot of ground.

"... you can't trust anything any more..."

"... any advanced civilisation that has managed to reachspace and is visiting here in their craft must surely have gone through the AI revolution ... therefore..."

Watch to the end. It's your view that counts.

...

2025-02-26

The Daily Sceptic gives one "James Leary" the chance to make the pertinent comment that links our own sorry situation to those in Europe.

It seems to be undoubtedly true that there is a "Great Game" being played out around the world and in particular around eastern Europe and the Middle East - the only question is "who is doing what to whom and what is their motivation?".

Why did Germany commit "green" suicide by closing all its effective power plants in favour of windmills and solar panels which simply cannot power its industrial base?

Why is the UK intent on committing the exact same blunder, whilst simultaneously imagining that it can build a (shhh - don't tell them) hugely power-hungry AI data centre driven future?

Will we ever win the war in Ukraine against the dastardly deranged power-mad Putin? 

Maybe Putin actually does understand that power really is the

2025-02-25

The future of AI?

The market leaders took a knock recently when the Chinese DeepSeek made its debut on the world AI stage, denting their aura of invincibility and sending shock waves through the stock valuations of certain chip makers.

But who actually understands how AIs work?

And equally importantly, how they don't work? After all, they are the creation of human beings (work with me here) so will inevitably tend to inherit the human characteristic of fallibility.

So is AI on course to World take-over en route to conquering the Solar System, the Galaxy, and ultimately the Universe?

2025-02-24

"The original Q operation was a military intelligence drop system, designed to encourage independent research and public awareness of corruption"

The gauntlet dropped by Q was picked up by amateur sleuths everywhere.

"The “QAnon” label became a catch-all smear—any discussion of government corruption, human trafficking, or elite criminal networks could now be dismissed as “QAnon conspiracy theories"

... but only by the gullible. The amateur sleuths continued regardless and brought us to where we are today.

Perhaps AI has its uses after all.

Read Martin's original analyses of the Q phenomenon, links

2025-02-16

When is an assertion a "fact"?

What is a "fact"?

In law a "fact" is some assertion agreed by both parties to the dispute.

Does that mean it is true and accurate? Either way, it tells us something about the law, and perhaps also about "facts".

Socrates is widely credited with the realisation that "the only thing I know is that I know nothing", and in this day and age when most of what we "know" is gleaned from remote others whom we do not personally "know", this assertion rings more true than ever.

What do the "fact-checkers" know that we do not?!

So our knowledge and beliefs as recognised by each of us are a result of our

2025-02-15

Martin Geddes is trailblazing as usual.

Here he has been educating ChatGPT with his views on Marxism - views with which I would agree.

ChatGPT seems surprisingly eager to assimilate his information, which rather begs the question - if it's that easy to get it to modify its views, could anybody do this? Obviously, the answer is yes, but I suppose it may depend upon how illogical the modified views would turn out to be.

After all, what Martin seems to have done is introduce an alternative assumption into the AI works - and assumptions are the basis upon which all theories rest. When we get to the stage that "events dear boy, events" quieten down a bit, I may have time/inclination to see if I can get AI to produce some spectacularly incorrect results simply by introducing an invalid assumption or two into its thinking, but until then there is a website to run...

2025-02-13

Martin Geddes (yes, he again) now summarises (with a little help from ChatGPT) just why he considers that Durham County Council may be outside the law in terms of its council tax enforcement processes.

That isn't at all to say that all councils are similarly suspect - I have no details - but nor can I rule it out, especially as many of them, like CDOS (see the article) will be members of the CIVEA (Civil Enforcement Association) and may be thought likely to have similar systems to Durham CC.

"These assaults on the public appear to be war crimes (as enemy combatants), crimes against humanity, and terrorist attacks — so fall under international human rights law and military jurisdiction"

Is Your Council Tax Enforcement Really Fraudulent?

Whatever the truth of all this is, it is also true