2025-09-25

It's a funny word isn't it? Does anybody understand what "agentic" actually means?]

Well, you do now, and I can guess that you might be associating it with the plans for the New World Order where the population is controlled by AI, soon enough without human intervention...

But how could that be possible in any responsible timescale? Wouldn't years of testing and refinement be required before it could be regarded as "good enough"? 

But why would they care if it wasn't good enough for mere humans? It would only be the human population that would be affected (you and me and the rest of the hoi polloi - "the many", or such as may remain of us), and we know with what loving care and attention they prepared the quaxxines for us.

Jacob Nordangård

2025-09-15

Nigel Farage is "preparing for power" (where have we heard that before?!).

And he has a man to lead that process - Danny Kruger, newly joined from the failing Conservative and Unionist Party.

The video featured today covers this announcement. It was an interesting announcement, although it did little more than set out a few ambiguous hints and tips that may or may not produce fruit in due course.

We on this site don't do party politics, but this is an appropriate occasion for us to draw out a few pertinent points of relevance to the UK political scene.

(70 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-09-14

Martin Geddes has been exploring a few of these tunnels for some time. No doubt there are more to be explored in due course, if not under due process...

Still, his prior explorations enable him to recognise the tell-tale evasions that seem to be required to enable them all. So if one can be collapsed, so can they all.

"Running the whole file through AI has only confirmed what was already clear: the state is not administering justice, it is engaged in systematic racketeering and financial harvesting of travellers"

"This is not just predatory taxation or 'bad government.' It is flat-out treason: bypassing the constitution of the land, enabling fraud under colour of law, and laundering theft through sham tribunals"

"Compared to the ordinary mob, this racket is worse — because it cloaks itself in legitimacy and systematically denies remedy"

Is Epstein More than a mere Agent of the Mossad Control System?

2025-08-14

Yes, more from Martin Geddes, who (rightly) suspects that we could all do with a (relatively) simple primer to help us navigate our "mismanaged" justice system.

"I’ve boiled that work down into a shorter, reusable list for anyone else facing the same fraud and injustice"

Good luck!

2025-08-11

A glimpse of the future, or a load of... ?

Dick Allgire spills the beans on the predicted monetary future.

But bear in mind that predictions are inherently tricky, especially about the future...

(67 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-08-11

"The age of title, costume, and jurisdictional deceit is over. Now begins the age of clean signal"

We are defined by what we do, not by what we hope for.

"The final lie is that we are powerless until the regime admits defeat. But the truth is — we are already free"

Martin Geddes draws the necessary conclusions.

2025-08-11

The erratic behaviour of certain world leaders gives rise to a number of possibilities...

1. They are beholden to a number of skilful advisors, whose policies they profess depending on who last had their ear
2. They are played by a number of clones / substitute actors who are beholden to different controllers through blackmail and/or bribery
3. They are robotic AI simulationsserving various AI master programs that are in constant IT conflict to achieve and maintain control of the mouthpiece

There may be other possibilities, but these three suffice to demonstrate the point.

Outlandish you say?

But nothing is off the table. Except perhaps peace in our  time. Or actual prosecutions of the guilty

2025-08-08

Is the world about to be overruled by AI?

Should we be worried?

Will we all go the way of the WEF's Yuval Noah Harari and become hacked to the point that we function as nodes on the huminternet, mindlessly obeying Grand Central AI's instructions?

Or is AI something to be stamped out as inimical to our future as Free Spirits?

Our chances of uninventing AI are looking vanishingly smaller by the hour, so maybe we need to find a third way (just not the Blairite "third way" - that didn't work either).

So where to look? As ever, I suggest in what some may consider the most unlikely place, but a place nonetheless which time and again seems to come up trumps - a financial newsletter.

Time to revisit Investor's Daily. This is not to push any

2025-07-28

AI is coming now well-established, if not yet totally ubiquitous. Give it another week or two.

We have people who have bested it in argument! So is it perfect?

In a world in which it is increasingly difficult to differentiate between truth and falsehood, AI is dependent upon its training materials, so maybe it's inevitable that it will make mistakes depending upon the content of such training materials.

Yet if a mark of perfection is an ability to recognise and correct its mistakes, then it's getting there.

But if it takes a human to prompt it so to do, then perhaps it's a mistake to assume that we hominids aren't needed any more?

Investor's Daily has a slightly different (well OK - exactly opposite) but none the less interesting take on the situation (this is not financial advice):

...

2025-07-26

"Carlisle Absurdity" rules...

... but only if you play along with the hoax.

Martin Geddes doesn't accept the hoax, but moves his case against the non-court system of pseudo-justice forward by that time-honoured method of giving it a label.

Now we can all talk about the "Carlisle Absurdity", and know exactly what it means.

Why should the devil have all the best labels?

Read the history here.

2025-07-24

"What happens when the justice system abandons its foundational attachment to law?"

I hope that Martin Geddes has a good answer.

AI can do wonders for his case, and few there can be who would both recognise the significance and possess the skills and tenacity to see it through.

He deserves our fulsome support.

2025-07-21

Suddenly, Berlin now boasts the fully fledged(?) Global GovernmentTechnological Centre, which will presumably in due course (or earlier?) take over from the failed democracies of the world to manage the global populations through (you guessed it) the marvels of modern AI. What could possibly go wrong?

Could it be worse than what we currently have?

Could it be better?

Has it been tested? (Maybe it has, in that paragon of democracy, the Ukraine?! But maybe also in Berlin, where it no doubt coped splendidly with the sort of issues that arise all too often in Germany).

Is there any proper democratic alternative (perhaps run by humans?) that might be

2025-07-17

Mark Playne assists ChatGPT 4 to put on its detective hat and provide answers to the hot questions of the "pandemic".

Was the PCR test suitable for general use?

Was the trial of Reiner Fuellmich fair and unbiased?

Dive in!

2025-07-07

If you have been following this site for a little while you may have noticed that we don't confine ourselves to any particular theme or subject-matter - our purpose (however well or badly achieved) is simply to challenge our readers to 'think outside the box".

Basically I roam wherever my fancy takes me, or wherever the tram-lines of mainstream media need to be challenged. I try not to present conclusions - reaching conclusions, possibly even just recognising possible conclusions, is your task.

Conjuring with concepts is a favoured ploy - can we align outwardly different concepts alongside each other to identify previously unrecognised linkage? 

With what new insights might we terrify ourselves?!

Perhaps unexpectedly, AI can be a engine which does precisely that. But can AI, that robustly logical machine, really conjure unexpected insights from its 100% logical workings?

Martin, Marauder of Ghost Courts

2025-07-02

"I just wanted to share with readers how I am using AI for... a parallel FoI request for the slightly different ghost court name used at an earlier point in the prosecution"

If the "Court" which has summoned you has no legal standing, then its activities are unconstitutional and invalid, of no legal effect.

Is the whole system of UK justice actually fake? Without authority? Bogus?

He dubs his proposal "Legal antimatter for constitutional repair" utilising

"From £100 fine to £250,000 problem: the 'Absolute Zero Protocol'"

...

2025-07-02

Ole Dammegard, conspiracy investigator par excellence, speaking to Riku Direct, discusses his life, his life's work, and his approach to his calling.

And he brings news of somebody else using ChatGPT to discard it's normal filters and give "unbiased" answers (you can email him for the necessary files!). 

It's a wide-ranging interview, very relaxed in typical Ole style.

"Turn off the electricity - you're screwed!"

"We can only do the best we can"

"Decentralise decentralise decentralise!"

(2 hrs 19 minutes)

Great News! Modern Industrial Strategy Welcomed!

2025-06-24

Rupert Sheldrake (speaking at the Glastonbury Symposium 2020) now meets Martin Geddes (and his AI) to explore a startling proposition - that the Q drops were never meant to be decoded in the style of Sherlock Holmes, but rather to prompt our intuitive access to truths already "out there" within the field of consciousness, via morphic resonance - the recognition of existing patterns of information.

"You are no longer a consumer of a message. You become a carrier wave of the field"

I guess these are deep waters, but fascinating none the less. So today I feature Rupert at the Glastonbury Symposium of 2020, where he explains his theories:

(102 minutes)

Like / Dislike this