2025-12-31

It can now be seen to be true.

The law is for the containment/exploitation of the masses, not for their protection from their rulers.

Martin Geddes has lifted the lid on the situation in the UK. When push comes to shove and the UK Justice Department is asked politely to justify the authority of their courts, their only response is evasion. If they had an answer, they only had to produce it. They have not.

Follow our reporting on this long saga here.

Mark Sexton and Ian Clayton have lifted the lid on "

2025-12-22

Nick Hudson - follower of the money - interviewed by Neil Oliver.

Our modern world is gradually being revealed, partly through the communicative power of the internet, and partly through the growing realisation that the world is not what we thought it was, and the many who have decided that they want to know how the world really works is now growing exponentially. AI or no AI.

Those who do know should be getting increasingly worried - but who exactly are they anyway?

As money (of whatever nature) is "what makes the world go round", those who understand the operation of the various monetary systems (lawful or otherwise) should be well placed to understand how our world operates.

(50 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-12-15

It's money makes the world go round...  Oh Wait! maybe it's AI?

Is Hollywood doomed?

Is megabucks film-making doomed? 

Well, perhaps yes, yes, and no.

The world is changing beyond recognition in front of us - and who can say that Hollywood hasn't been a huge, perhaps THE HUGE influence on our lives cultures and traditions so far?

As a child I went to see the great Disney movies - Bambi, Snow White (and the wicked witch!), Pinocchio, etc. Magical experiences all. Some of us care-worn souls may psycho-analyse them for hidden messages of portent these days, but back then they were viewed as brilliant feel-good entertainment.

And they were. Every child in their innocence should still see them. 

Investors Daily reads the runes and gives us the good news and the

2025-12-14

... one generation at a time.

Another story of taxation run wild.

Is this "peak taxation"? 

Not a chance, except for an intervening general economic collapse, or maybe a general taxation strike - pretty difficult when your employer pays your tax to HMRC before he pays you...

An interesting question though - if your employer owes you money under your contract of employment, are they entitled to give some of it to someone else just because the someone else says so? Custom and practice is not necessarily law, and we are discovering new things every day now. 

Although it's an interesting question, maybe the first port of call would be to check the fine print in your offer/contract of employment....   and after that, a session with ChatGpt or maybe Grok.

2025-12-10

If you are an IT executive and thinking to outsource your IT systems design and implementation - but not to China or India, but to an AI...  this may be for you.

No business is static. The static ones tend to fall by the wayside as customers change their ways and want something better.

And every system needs tweaking fix problems and cope with unintended consequences...

Change is the order of the day for any IT system, and especially the new ones navigating the bathtub curve for the first time.

How will your shiny new AI-designed systems cope with the requirement for change?

2025-12-07

And not before time.

It has always baffled me how anybody could be so dumb as to believe in the CO₂ demon when the said demon accounts for such a tiny proportion of our current atmosphere, and when each of the much-foretold climate disasters reliably fail to occur - the only reasonable explanation seems to be that the climate catastrophists are in fact cult members for whom the slavish devotion to cult dogma is their prerequisite for self-referential meaning.

Maybe we can now get back to saving the world from the climate cultists by "Drilling Baby, Drilling" and actually burning the resulting gas and oil so that we can keep warm again. Let's hope it's not too late.

Speaking of that unfamiliar "warm", we shouldn't forget that hot baths, ideally taken long and leisurely before bed (particularly laced with a healthy dose of sea salt, or Epsom salts (for the magnesium in

2025-12-05

Well, if we want to talk about it, we need the words.

Martin Geddes aided and abetted by his automated assistants Grok and ChatGpt comes up with the goods:

2025-12-04

We are familiar with the the term "false flag" - something happens in such a way that it is attributed to someone or some grouping that wasn't actually involved.

It's a straight deception, originating in naval battle where an attacking force flies a flag other than its own in order to elude culpability.

In these more sophisticated days it is often associated (so some conspiracy theorists might aver) with a need to influence public opinion to accept a course of action to which they would not otherwise consent.

Such as war.

Martin Geddes has a slightly but significantly different problem with his legal battles to try to establish the validity of the operations of our current system of justice.

Mark Sexton would seem to be running up against a

2025-12-01

Martin Geddes has established (at least to his logic-based satisfaction) that some, maybe many of the "magistrates courts" currently "hearing cases" have defective foundation in law, and cannot therefore operate within the law. 

And, with a little help from one or two AI assistants, he has developed a procedure for validating such "courts", a procedure which (he asserts) anybody in receipt of a summons (or other legal demand from the State) may use to verify its authenticity.

"For the first time in British history, citizens can formally verify the legality of the State"

He lists the process by which he came to the "court name requirement specification", and then lays out that specification itself, as deduced by AI from the Magistrates Court Act 1980.

Worth

2025-11-30

We could proffer a list, but some whiz-kid would set to and prove us wrong in no time.

But this one looks reasonable...  even if I do believe that there should be more than one thing on the list. One will do for a start.

2025-11-28

Will the AI world end in Utopia or Nightmare?

Will the AI rule us, or "enhance" us as the WEF would have it, so that we will work for them, own nothing, and be "happy" (define "happy")?

Or will we somehow wriggle out from under and make use of an AI that is our faithful servant?

Or that appears to us to be our faithful servant, much as Parliament has contrived (but ultimately failed) to appear to us? I would place quite a large bet on the AI making a vastly better fist of appearing to us as our servant whilst manipulating us into complying with what it wants us to do, than Parliament.

Perhaps the ultimate AI would be called "Jeeves", would know us (and our relatives friends and acquaintances) better than we know ourselves, and would always know how to politely and resourcefully get us out of the scrapes that we get ourselves

2025-11-25

Yes, Martin Geddes has been up to his illuminations of matters legal and lawful, in terms that I would wager most of us could comprehend.

If we were asked to attend court and found ourselves "had up" before the head teacher in the local secondary school, we might begin to question the genuineness not only of the proceedings but also of those conducting the proceedings.

"When is a 'Court' not a Court?" would be a relevant question, and the Head Teacher should have some explaining to do.

Still, if instead we had attended in a building labelled as a "Court" and been confronted by somebody professing to be a magistrate, would anybody dare to question the legitimacy of the situation? Yet the overwhelming likelihood of just accepting the given as legitimate surely is an open invitation for fraudsters to take advantage? Even unwitting fraudsters who themselves had not validated their higher authority?

2025-11-08

Those of us who have been around for years will understand and relate to this more than those who have joined our planet more recently, but we can certainly all learn from it.

Native cultures include our own European cultures - they are still in many ways cohesive, for all the attempts, successful or otherwise, that have tended to whittle away at that cohesion in favour of replacing our reliance on our human community with reliance on the inhuman State.

Yet in chronological sequence, as natives of the seats of the colonizing powers of old (yet still undead) we looked on as native cultures elsewhere were given the treatment, we, thinking ourselves somehow immune, were saved til last to undergo the final treatment that would bring about their global control grid with everybody inside it.

Was the State always inhuman? Yes it was, in so far as except within the ruler's personal court, it always runs on a rule book (or these days infinitely many rule books)

2025-10-30

The technocracy of tomorrow is incoming today, and the lightning speed of technological development isn't short of the BIG BUCKS that will speed it on its way.

So what do we have in store for us if we inadvertently allow Big Tech to pierce a crack in our armour? They have already shown us that they won't hesitate to claim our acquiescence even if they didn't bother to do the "informing" part of "informed consent".

And they don't show any sign of changing their ways, even as they show every sign of changing our's.

Once we let them into our minds to "enhance our thinking" through "the power of AI" (or they do it anyway without openly saying so), then it's open season to do as they please with us; our consent to their dystopia will be automatically theirs through the wonders of technology.

If the AI doesn't approve of us thinking "no", it will simply "enhance our thinking" so that we think "yes!". Job

2025-10-12

Martin updates us on the sorry story (The Trial from Appleby Horse Fair) that exposes the charades that our "system of justice" deploys to bamboozle and exhaust us into compliance with its illegal and unlawful demands.

Illegal because they do not reference real Courts as laid down by law (even where such real Courts may exist!) and unlawful because they are essentially fraudulent, and fraud vitiates everything.

This is his public record of these unfathomable framings, and how the system seeks at every turn to to evade its responsibilities and prevent a challenge from being heard in a real court. Perhaps they really do have something to hide?

Martin 's Public Record.

2025-10-09

Martin Geddes once more, this time trying to give us insight into the primary question of our time:

"What the Hell is going on?"

Making sense of the news (from wherever we may glean it) has never been more tricky - and certainly many believe that we can no longer (if ever we could) rely on the august probity of the BBC to interpret the news for us.

Take for example the Charlie Kirk phenomenon. That really does look like the proverbial rabbit-hole where it seems impossible to sort the truth from the multiple apparent misdirections.

So perhaps we need an investigatory framework within which to marshal the facts, the assertions, and indeed the improbable but not definitively excluded possibilities.

"You won’t need a PhD to join: reference frameworks and

2025-10-09

"Abuse" can occur at many levels right through from the Global to the personal (OK, the pedantic may want to replace "global" by "galactic" or some such, but you get the point).

"The Matrix" is a systematic abuse of the population at large through widespread application of  deceit, fear, and misdirection, through media either unwitting, careless, or complicit.

Within this system we inevitably end up in one of a number of different role types (perhaps several types over different times and circumstances) which Martin Geddes has identified with a little help from AI.

It's useful to understand what is going on here, as it may help us to recognise what is going on in our own circumstances. Although I don't suppose that the list is exhaustive, it's a start.

"The purpose is not to assign blame, but to give you

2025-10-03

When we have checked out the world's religions and remained unconvinced, when we have tried every political party but failed to find any that we could trust, when we have reviewed all our personal acquaintances and decided that none will offer us what we want, and when the supply of gurus in our location falls similarly short...

Perhaps, just perhaps, we have been looking in the wrong place all along?

But where else is there left to look?

(26 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.
See more by

2025-09-28

The recent State Visit by il Presidento Trumpo to King Charles at Windsor is a bit of a puzzle.

What, if anything of significance, was achieved? 

Will Trump get a new golf course to add to his collection? Or was it all about AI data centres and the necessary power stations to drive them right over Ed Milliband's dreams of eliminating the gas of life, all to service the Global Digital Id project?

Or was it all Spectacle and Theatre designed to keep the public distracted whilst other matters are played out behind closed doors?

And where does the impending closure of US federal government at the end of September when the spending taps get turned off (they never have yet!) leave this "special relationship" - will they be forced once again to accept loans from the City of London to keep USA Inc afloat?

Page 2 of 6